PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Monday, June 11, 2012

skvorecz, abrams

REVERSED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1637 Ex Parte Kiefer et al 11/959,251 FREDMAN 103 Genomic Health, Inc. (Bozicevic, Field & Francis) MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE

“The protocol of giving claims their broadest reasonable interpretation during examination does not include giving claims a legally incorrect interpretation. This protocol is solely an examination expedient, not a rule of claim construction.” In re Skvorecz, 580 F.3d 1262, 1267 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2167 Ex Parte Sen et al 11/691,386 MARTIN 103 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. BADAWI, SHERIEF

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2478 Ex Parte Ortiz et al 10/174,602 THOMAS 103 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY BRUCKART, BENJAMIN R

2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2857 Ex Parte Otterbach et al 10/095,636 KOHUT 102 KENYON & KENYON LLP SCHECHTER, ANDREW M

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3682 Ex Parte Adams et al 10/865,826 FETTING 103 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP HOAR, COLLEEN A

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1778 Ex Parte Dierkes et al 11/043,379 OBERMANN 103 103 NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A. ANDERSON, DENISE R

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2156 Ex Parte Mueller et al 11/538,393 ARBES 101/103 102/103 Brake Hughes Bellermann LLP c/o CPA Global  RAHMAN, SABANA

AFFIRMED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1612 Ex Parte Jensen et al 10/723,423 Per curiam 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 VIKSNINS HARRIS & PADYS PLLP KISHORE, GOLLAMUDI S

1646 Ex Parte Manning et al 10/683,214 PRATS 103 King & Spalding LLP Seharaseyon, Jegatheesan

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1741 Ex Parte Disteldorf et al 11/878,318 GAUDETTE 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC FRANKLIN, JODI COHEN

1741 Ex Parte Disteldorf et al 11/492,204 GAUDETTE 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC FRANKLIN, JODI COHEN

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2164 Ex Parte Puustinen 11/174,092 JEFFERY 103 Haynes and Boone, LLP KHOSHNOODI, FARIBORZ

2181 RAMBUS, INC. Patent Owner, Appellant v. NVIDIA CORPORATION Requestor, Respondent 95/001,134 6,260,097 09/514,872 EASTHOM 102/103 Paul M. Anderson, PLLC ESCALANTE, OVIDIO original AUVE, GLENN ALLEN

2600 Communications
2624 Ex Parte Linares 10/190,739 BISK 103 GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE,ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.C DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN

2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2874 PANDUIT CORPORATION Requester and Cross-Appellant v. Patent of ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS Patent Owner and Respondent 95/000,415 6,925,242 10/871,641 LEBOVITZ 102/103 MERCHANT & GOULD PC ENGLISH, PETER C original PALMER, PHAN T H

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3625 Ex Parte Sundaram et al 10/929,358 KIM 112(2)/101/103 KANG LIM SHAH, AMEE A

See In re Abrams, 188 F.2d 165, 168 (CCPA 1951) (“[c]itation of authority in support of the principle that claims to mental concepts which constitute the very substance of an alleged invention are not patentable is unnecessary. It is self-evident that thought is not patentable”).

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3734 Ex Parte Zaguroli 11/399,618 PRATS 103 JOHN R. BENEFIEL SCHUBERT, CHRISTOPHER

3777 Ex Parte Graw 10/383,280 HOELTER 102/103 Siemens Corporation CHENG, JACQUELINE

No comments :