PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Thursday, April 18, 2013

ariad, hyatt

US 6,592,593 B1

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1735 Ex Parte Egli 11311748 - (D) KATZ 102/103 The Dow Chemical Company ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS LLC IP, SIKYIN
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Parees et al 11858931 - (D) COURTENAY 103 IBM CORP. (WSM) c/o WINSTEAD P.C. LU, CHARLES EDWARD

2168 Ex Parte van Beek et al 10867981 - (D) HUME 103 CHERNOFF VILHAUER MCCLUNG & STENZEL, LLP LY,CHEYNE D

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2456 Ex Parte Harrington 11774660 - (D) DANG 102 Yudell Isidore Ng Russell PLLC BARQADLE, YASIN M

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3664 Ex Parte Fletcher et al 11581094 - (D) PLENZLER 103 HONEYWELL/IFL KISWANTO, NICHOLAS

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3773 Ex Parte Taylor et al 11544477 - (D) GRIMES 112(1) 102/103 Covidien LP LAUER, CHRISTINA C

See Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (“[T]he test for sufficiency is whether the disclosure of the application relied upon reasonably conveys to those skilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed subject matter as of the filing date.”).

Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 94 USPQ2d 1161 (Fed. Cir. 2010)(en banc) 2161.01

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2128 Ex Parte Linder et al 10103123 - (D) JEFFERY 103 Siemens Corporation ALHIJA, SAIF A

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2426 Ex Parte Nakatsuyama 10725149 - (D) KUMAR 102/103 MAYER & WILLIAMS PC ZHONG,JUN FEI

2437 Ex Parte Himmel et al 11764829 - (D) CURCURI 103 IBM AUSTIN IPLAW (DG) C/O DELIZIO GILLIAM, PLLC ABYANEH, ALI S

2478 Ex Parte Eytchison et al 10763866 - (D) QUINN 103 HAVERSTOCK & OWENS LLP ALI, FARHAD

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2699 Ex Parte Chung et al 10844544 - (D) SMITH 103/obviousness-type double patenting H.C. PARK & ASSOCIATES, PLC LIANG, REGINA

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2885 Ex Parte Yaw et al 11941627 - (D) SMITH 102/103 Fox Rothschild LLP NEGRON, ISMAEL

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3631 Ex Parte Stewart et al 11211978 - (D) BAHR 103 CAROTHERS AND CAROTHERS STERLING, AMY JO

3634 Ex Parte Ulatowski 11316074 - (D) HORNER 112(2)/103 DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP - Denver PUROL, DAVID M

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3778 Ex Parte DeVries et al 11979142 - (D) FRANKLIN 103/non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting McDermott Will & Emery LLP DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA

See Hyatt v. Dudas, 551 F.3d 1307, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (“When the appellant fails to contest a ground of rejection to the Board, . . . the Board may treat any argument with respect to that ground of rejection as waived. In the event of such a waiver, the PTO may affirm the rejection of the group of claims that the examiner rejected on that ground without considering the merits of those rejections.”). See also MPEP § 1205.02 (“If a ground of rejection stated by the examiner is not addressed in the appellant‟s brief, that ground of rejection will be summarily sustained by the Board.”).

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
3663 GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. Requester and Appellant v. PIONEER CORPORATION Patent Owner 95001335 6941222 10/132,570 WEINBERG 103 YOUNG & THOMPSON CABRERA, ZOILA E original TO, TUAN C

No comments :