PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Thursday, June 20, 2013

klosak, ishizaka, peterson, geisler

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1759 Ex Parte Gau 10954078 - (D) OBERMANN 103 LAW OFFICES OF TRAVIS L. DODD, PC BALL, JOHN C

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2658 Ex Parte Chengalvarayan et al 11336081 - (D) CLEMENTS Dissenting SMITH 102/103 General Motors Corporation c/o REISING ETHINGTON P.C. CHAWAN, VIJAY B

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3653 Ex Parte Hancock 11317562 - (D) WOOD 103 PITNEY BOWES INC. MORRISON, THOMAS A

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3721 Ex Parte Toulouse et al 11569567 - (D) FLOYD 103 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 LOWE, HAUPTMAN, HAM & BERNER, LLP (ITW) CHUKWURAH, NATHANIELC

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1731 Ex Parte Amey et al 11678117 - (D) FRANKLIN 103 CURATOLO SIDOTI CO., LPA MARCANTONI, PAUL D

1733 Ex Parte Jiang et al 12603152 - (D) OWENS 103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ROE, JESSEE RANDALL

1747 Ex Parte Mruk et al 11838422 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY FISCHER, JUSTIN R

1782 Ex Parte Hanita et al 10567360 - (D) SCHAFER 103 SUGHRUE MION, PLLC RAUDENBUSH, ELLEN SUZANNE

1784 Ex Parte Dangelmaier 11776184 - (D) GARRIS 103 DICKE, BILLIG & CZAJA ZIMMERMAN, JOHN J

1791 Ex Parte Roth 11363419 - (D) HASTINGS 103 The Culbertson Group, P.C. STULII, VERA

The burden of showing unexpected results rests on the person who asserts them by establishing that the difference between the claimed invention and the closest prior art was an unexpected difference. See Application of Klosak, 455 F. 2d 1077, 1080 (CCPA 1972), Ex Parte ISHIZAKA, 24 USPQ2d 1621, 1624 (BPAI 1992).  Further, the showing of unexpected results must be commensurate in scope with the claims.  See In re Peterson, 315 F. 3d 1325, 1330-31 (Fed. Cir. 2003). Finally, unexpected results must be established by factual evidence.  See In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1470-71 (Fed. Cir. 1997)

Klosak DONNER 8:1316, 1317

Ishizaka, Ex parte, 24 USPQ2d 1621 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1992) 716.02(b)

Peterson, In re, 315 F.3d 1325, 65 USPQ2d 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2003) 716.02(d), 2144.05
HARMON 4: 90, 374
DONNER 8: 1713-19

Geisler, In re, 116 F.3d 1465, 43 USPQ2d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2144.05, 2145
HARMON 4: 373, 374-76; 20: 165
DONNER 8: 1682, 1683, 1689, 1713; 13: 234

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Blohm 10954440 - (D) CLEMENTS 103 Fritzsche Patent c/o Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (SEN) PADMANABHAN, KAVITA

2164 Ex Parte Zondervan et al 11612317 - (D) CURCURI 101/103 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP ADAMS, CHARLES D

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3674 Ex Parte Miller et al 11262313 - (D) PLENZLER 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY c/o CPA Global LEE, GILBERT Y

REEXAMINATION  

AFFIRMED
1203 PUBLIC PATENT FOUNDATION Requester v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES Patent Owner and Appellant 90009811 5,648,497 08/410,623 LEBOVITZ Obviousness-type double patenting ABBOTT LABORATORIES HUANG, EVELYN MEI original FAN, JANE T  

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2624 HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K. Requester v. APERIO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Patent Owner and Appellant 95000518 7457446 11/173,818 WEINBERG 112(1)/103 PATTRIC J. RAWLINS / Aperio Technologies, Inc. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO & NADEL LLP POKRZYWA, JOSEPH R original LU, TOM Y

FEDERAL CIRCUIT

AFFIRMED  
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2871 2503 THOMSON LICENSING SAS, AND THOMSON LICENSING, LLC, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND QISDA CORPORATION, QISDA AMERICA CORPORATION, QISDA (SUZHOU) CO., LTD., BENQ CORPORATION, BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION, AND BENQ LATIN AMERICA CORPORATION, Intervenors, AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Intervenors, AND CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, INNOLUX CORPORATION, AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Intervenors.  2012-1536 5,978,063 08/842,586 5,648,674 08/474,845 LOURIE 102/103 THOMSON Licensing LLC; Kirkland & Ellis, LLP; Office of General Counsel ITC; Latham & Watkins, LLP; White & Case LLP; Hogan Lovells US LLP TON, MINH TOAN T  JACKSON JR, JEROME

No comments :