REVERSED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2656 Ex Parte Foxenland 11278582 - (D) FREDMAN 103 SNYDER, CLARK, LESCH & CHUNG, LLP ZENATI, AMAL S
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3779 Ex Parte Zeiner et al 11589995 - (D) ADAMS 102(b)/103 WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC HENDERSON, RYAN N
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1652 Ex Parte Huisman et al 11924350 - (D) MILLS 103 103 Pabst Patent Group HUTSON, RICHARD G
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2424 Ex Parte Arling et al 11823739 - (D) TORNQUIST 103 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP (CHI) HICKS, CHARLES N
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2684 Ex Parte Bauman et al 11652984 - (D) McKONE 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. / LEAR CORPORATION SHERWIN, RYAN W
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2838 Ex Parte Schuster et al 10584337 - (D) NEW Concurring TORCZON 103 KENYON & KENYON LLP PHAM, EMILY P
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3767 Ex Parte Grispo 10780269 - (D) YANG 103 MARSH, FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP GILBERT, ANDREW M
See In re Hampel, 162 F.2d 483, 485 (CCPA 1947) (upholding affirmance of obviousness rejection because “[t]here is nothing in the instant record which indicates that the particular order of steps
produces results differing in any way from those which would be brought about if another order of steps were followed”).
See also In re Burhans, 154 F.2d 690, 692 (CCPA 1946) (affirming obviousness rejection “in the absence of any proof in the record that the order of performing the steps produces any new and unexpected results”).
Burhans, In re, 154 F.2d 690, 69 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1946) 2144.04
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED
1303 Ex parte LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LTD. Appellant 90009508 4624737 06/743,092 CHEN 102(b)/103 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP (WA) original MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP NGUYEN, TUAN H original POWELL, WILLIAM A
FEDERAL CIRCUIT
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1647; 1646 SANOFI-AVENTIS, Appellant, v. PFIZER INC., Appellee. 2012-1345 6,268,480 08/846,344 5,710,023 08/609,572 NEWMAN interference Lucas & Mercanti, LLP; Ropes & Gray, LLP; WYETH LLC; DRAPER, GARNETTE D; BASHAM, DARYL A
No comments :
Post a Comment