PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Monday, January 19, 2015

gordon, galderma

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Pruitt et al 11978336 - (D) JENKS 103 ALCON RESEARCH LTD. RIDER, LANCE W

1631 Ex Parte Torre-Bueno 11641246 - (D) ADAMS 103 DAKO/FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, LLP DEJONG, ERIC S

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1754 Ex Parte Zappi et al 12136331 - (D) ANKENBRAND 103 GE Licensing COHEN, BRIAN W
REVERSED 2652 Ex Parte Hansen et al 12140610 - (D) ADAMS 102 IBM CORP. (WSM) c/o WINSTEAD P.C. ASANBAYEV, OLEG

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2654 Ex Parte Redman et al 11496443 - (D) ADAMS 112(1)/103 MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD LEE, PING

2682 Ex Parte Griffin et al 12394243 - (D) HUGHES 103 ADDMG - BlackBerry DORSEY, RENEE

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2892 Ex Parte CASTRO et al 12503553 - (D) HANLON 103 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED ZHU, SHENG-BAI

See In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (the mere fact that the prior art could be modified in the manner proposed would not have made the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the desirability of the modification).

Gordon, In re, 733 F.2d 900, 221 USPQ 1125 (Fed. Cir. 1984) 2143.01 2144.08

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3774 Ex Parte QUAID et al 12144517 - (D) FREDMAN 103 Foley & Lardner LLP GANESAN, SUBA

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2159 Ex Parte Rudolph 11851282 - (D) LENTIVECH 103 SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLC SPIELER, WILLIAM

2162 Ex Parte GAUSMAN et al 12177638 - (D) FINK 102/103 AT&T LEGAL DEPARTMENT - NDQ LY, ANH

Although paragraph 438, cited by Appellants, states that “[s]uch voice capture is likely to be suboptimal in many situations, however, for example when there is substantial background noise, and accurate voice recognition is a difficult task at the best of times,” we do not agree this qualifying remark would lead a person of ordinary skill in a divergent direction as would be necessary for teaching away. See Galderma Labs., L.P. v. Tolmar, Inc., 737 F.3d 731, 738 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

2171 Ex Parte KAMIYABU 11971721 - (D) LaVIER 103 Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP TRAPANESE, WILLIAM C

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2421 Ex Parte Sue 11782563 - (D) MANTIS MERCADER 102 THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC. NGUYEN BA, HOANG VU A

REEXAMINATION

GRANTED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1715 ROY A. TERRY Requester and Appellant v. PIPE RESTORATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Patent Owner and Respondent Ex Parte Gillanders et al 7,858,149 11/649,647 95001717 - (D) LEBOVITZ 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) 103 LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN S. STEINBERGER TILL, TERRENCE R original FLETCHER III, WILLIAM P

No comments :