rose

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1619 Ex Parte Thevenet 11663772 - (D) FREDMAN 103 OLIFF PLC (with Nony) GREENE, NAN A

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3649 Ex Parte BONUCCI et al 13016435 - (D) BROWNE 103 Steinfl & Bruno LLP KRUER, KEVIN R

3664 Ex Parte HEINE et al 12562859 - (D) WIEKER 112(1)/102 ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP MANCHO, RONNIE M

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3741 Ex Parte Sabnis 13871221 - (D) CAPP 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY KIM, CRAIG SANG

3747 Ex Parte Lee et al 12832116 - (D) BAHR 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION AMICK, JACOB M

3766 Ex Parte Wu et al 12616513 - (D) CALVE 102/103 SHUMAKER & SIEFFERT, P.A BERTRAM, ERIC D

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1735 Ex Parte Ito et al 13809723 - (D) GAUDETTE 103 103 SUGHRUE-265550 PATEL, DEV ANG R

2445 Ex Parte Allan et al 13547326 - (D) EVANS double patenting 103 WITHROW & TERRANOVA, PLLC BIAGINI, CHRISTOPHER D

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2625 Ex Parte Gettemy 12019506 - (D) McNEILL 103 103 Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton/Qualcomm SHAPIRO, LEONID

The Examiner finds the combination of Sirola, Binstead, and Gibson teaches the limitations of claim 9, and reasoned that "two-sided panel [display] is a combination of two display[ s] back to back. To use additional display and additional sensor still is obvious variation of prior art of the record." Ans. 4. The Examiner finds "it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to interchange value the number of sensors and display panels." Final Act. 5 (citing In re Rose, 220 F.2d 459, 105 U.S.P.Q. 237 (C.C.P.A. 1955)).

Appellant argues the Examiner's reliance on In re Rose is misplaced because the case merely holds that creating multiple bundles of wood rather than a single bundle of wood is not inventive. App. Br. 10 (citing In re Rose, 220 F .2d at 463). Appellant argues claim 9 "implicates far more than a mere change in size." App. Br. 11.

Appellant has persuaded us of Examiner error.

Rose, In re, 220 F.2d 459, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955) 2144.04

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3674 Ex Parte Loveless et al 12718382 - (D) REIMERS 103 103 McDermott Will & Emery LLP RUNYAN, SILVANAC

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3735 Ex Parte Byrum et al 12557836 - (D) PER CURIAM 102 103 WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC MATTHEWS, CHRISTINE HOPKINS

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1613 Ex Parte Imboden et al 11997348 - (D) FREDMAN 112(1)/112(4)/103 Erickson Kernell IP, LLC BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1744 Ex Parte Van Der Eerden et al 13382845 - (D) ROSS 103 Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP GUPTA, YOGENDRAN

1785 Ex Parte YEN et al 13835873 - (D) REN double patenting/102 Duane Morris LLP (10/11) Seagate RICKMAN, HOLLY C

1798 Ex Parte Eastman 13426831 - (D) SMITH 102/103 SHERRILL LAW OFFICES TURK, NEIL N

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2469 Ex Parte Wijayanathan et al 12855540 - (D) BUI 103 Conley Rose - BlackBerry Files AMBAYE, MEWALE A

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2612 Ex Parte Benitez et al 12514855 - (D) COURTENAY 103 THOMSON Licensing LLC NGUYEN, KIMBINH T

2641 Ex Parte PAGONIS et al 13673068 - (D) CRAIG 103 Core Wireless Licensing Ltd HOLLIDAY, JAIME MICHELE

2646 Ex Parte Kamalakannan 13869789 - (D) BUI 103 HONEYWELL/SLW TAYLOR, BARRY W

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2826 Ex Parte Hull et al 13608350 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 MYERS BIGEL, P.A. KHAN, FARID H

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3774 Ex Parte Cole et al 12372328 - (D) BROWNE 103 WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP NELSON, CHRISTINE L