PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

hoch, glass

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Qian et al 13680524 - (D) PRATS 103/double patenting Emory University - Office of Tech Transfer DONOHUE, SEAN R

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2157 Ex Parte Otala 12830800 - (D) SZPONDOWSKI 102 Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP CHEUNG, HUBERT G

2183 Ex Parte Eichenberger et al 12250584 - (D) HOMERE 112(2)/103 Walder Intellectual Property Law, P.C. IBM Corp. (WIP) HUISMAN, DAVID J

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2487 Ex Parte Price et al 13443745 - (D) McNEILL 102/103 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP / Apple Inc. RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD J

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2637 Ex Parte Lust et al 13162169 - (D) MARGOLIES 102 41.50 112(1) HONEYWELL/SLW BELLO, AGUSTIN

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1619 Ex Parte Scavone et al 13101865 - (D) ADAMS 103 double patenting THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY KASSA, TIGABU

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2178 Ex Parte Dewar et al 12649711 - (D) MOORE 103 103 Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts LLP IBM Lotus & Rational SW HASTY, NICHOLAS

See In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341, 1342 n.3 (CCPA 1970) (“Where a reference is relied on to support a rejection, whether or not in a ‘minor capacity,’ there would appear to be no excuse for not positively including the reference in the statement of the rejection.”).

Hoch, In re, 428 F.2d 1341, 166 USPQ 406 (CCPA 1970) 706.02(j) 1207.03 2144.08

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1616 Ex Parte de Beer et al 12593747 - (D) LaVIER 103 COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY KASSA, JESSICA M

1628 Ex Parte Dalziel et al 13650274 - (D) LaVIER 103 GENENTECH, INC. CORNET, JEAN P

1632 Ex Parte Yamanaka et al 13585729 - (D) MILLS 112(1) KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP CROUCH, DEBORAH

“[Application sufficiency under § 112, first paragraph, must be judged as of its filing date. It is an applicant’s obligation to supply enabling disclosure without reliance on what others may publish after he has filed an application on what is supposed to be a completed invention. If he cannot supply enabling information, he is not yet in a position to file.” In re Glass, 492 F.2d 1228, 1232 (CCPA 1974).

Glass, In re, 492 F.2d 1228, 181 USPQ 31 (CCPA 1974) 608.01(h) 2124 2165.02

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2136 Ex Parte GOLDBERG 13355773 - (D) SMITH 103 GRIFFITHS & SEATON PLLC (IBM) DOAN, HAN V

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2456 Ex Parte Marshall et al 13396356 - (D) KHAN 102 102/double patenting AirWatch LLC SALAD, ABDULLAHI ELMI

2467 Ex Parte Laurila et al 11285107 - (D) AMUNDSON 103 Mintz Levin/Nokia Technologies Oy JONES, PRENELL P

2494 Ex Parte PARK et al 12705230 - (D) JEFFERY 103 THE FARRELL LAW FIRM, P.C. HO, THOMAS

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2611 Ex Parte Sali et al 13098497 - (D) Per Curiam 103 D. KLIGLER LP. SERVICES LTD. GRAY, RYAN M

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3626 Ex Parte Robertson 12636390 - (D) KIM 112(2) 103 41.50 103 VERIZON NAJARIAN, LENA

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3745 Ex Parte Rosenkrans et al 13340747 - (D) KINDER 112(1)/103 102/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2187 ARTERIS, INC., Requester, v. SONICS, INC., Patent Owner. Ex Parte 6961834 et al 09/977,510 95000669 - (D) SIU 112(1)/112(2)/103 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER: DLA PIPER US LLP CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D original NGUYEN, THAN VINH

No comments :