PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Friday, January 20, 2017

ariosa

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1631 Ex Parte Busche et al 12973766 - (D) ADAMS 101/103 HOFFMAN WARNICK LLC NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2141 Ex Parte Kennedy et al 12645025 - (D) THOMAS 103 Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C. VU, TOAN H

2165 Ex Parte KAWAMOTO et al 12629662 - (D) ENGLE 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. CHBOUKI, TAREK

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2685 Ex Parte Jubilo et al 13679131 - (D) McNEILL 102/103 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP YU, ROYIT

2697 Ex Parte Colley 12767344 - (D) HUME 102 Alston & Bird LLP Nokia Corporation LEIBY, CHRISTOPHER E

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Reitz et al 12896836 - (D) O’HANLON 103 FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY, LLP STAUBACH, LINDSEY CLAIRE

3744 Ex Parte Chantant 12668582 - (D) CALVE 103 SHELL OIL COMPANY MENGESHA, WEBESHET

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2468 Ex Parte Krzyzanowski et al 12639165 - (D) BAIN 103 103 OpenPeak Inc. CHANG, KAI J

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1633 Ex Parte McCray et al 12433659 - (D) FREDMAN 103 VIKSNINS HARRIS & PADYS PLLP BURKHART, MICHAEL D

1634 Ex Parte Chamberlain et al 12293763 - (D) PRATS 101 KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA

Indeed, our reviewing court has expressly rejected similar contentions regarding preemption, stating that a patentee’s “attempt to limit the breadth of the claims by showing alternative uses . . . outside of the scope of the claims does not change the conclusion that the claims are directed to patent ineligible subject matter.” Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., 788 F.3d 1371, 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2015). The court explained that, “[w]hile preemption may signal patent ineligible subject matter, the absence of complete preemption does not demonstrate patent eligibility. . . . Where a patent’s claims are deemed only to disclose patent ineligible subject matter under the Mayo framework . . . preemption concerns are fully addressed and made moot.” Id.

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2125 Ex Parte Rahnama 14231378 - (D) SHIANG 103 101 FISH & TSANG LLP HUANG, MIRANDA M

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2622 Ex Parte Fujita et al 12461675 - (D) HAGY 103 STAAS & HALSEY LLP NGO, TONY N

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3782 Ex Parte Hui 13283366 - (R) HOFFMANN 102/103 VEDDER PRICE P.C. NEWHOUSE, NATHAN JEFFREY

No comments :