SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

fracalossi

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2489 Ex Parte Shih 13823637 - (D) SHIANG Dissenting MANTIS MERCADER  112(1)/112(2)/103 ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE HODGES, SUSAN E

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2834 Ex Parte HOSEK et al 13744900 - (D) OWENS 102/103 HARRINGTON & SMITH LEUNG, QUYEN PHAN

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3646 Ex Parte Zhuikov et al 13611891 - (D) BAHR 103 WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP O'CONNOR, MARSHALL P

3652 Ex Parte Piccioni et al 11943570 - (D) SHAH 103 GREG GOSHORN, P.C. MYERS, GLENN F

3685 Ex Parte Goodwin 11762695 - (D) MEYERS 112(2)/103 41.50 101 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP HALE, TIM B

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3733 Ex Parte Ark et al 13675189 - (D) GRIMES 103 CARTER, DELUCA, FARRELL & SCHMIDT, LLP COTRONEO, STEVEN J

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2472 Ex Parte Larsson et al 13818127 - (D) BARRY 103 103 Murphy, Bilak & Homiller/Ericsson BHATTI, HASHIM S

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Dorn et al 11917431 - (D) SHAH 102/103 103 Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. C. R. Bard, Inc. RODJOM, KATHERINE MARIE

AFFIRMED

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte O’KEEFE et al 12090692 - (D) INGLESE 112(2)/103 Chipperson Law Group, P.C. HORNING, JOEL G

However, Appellants’ arguments directed to select experimental examples in Knapsack do not take into consideration Knapsack’s explicit disclosure that the applied ultrasonic energy is preferably greater than 0.01 watts per gram, which indicates a direct—rather than inverse— relationship between the level of ultrasonic energy applied and the mass of gypsum treated. In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794 n.l (CCPA 1982) (explaining that a prior art reference’s disclosure is not limited to its examples)

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2646 Ex Parte Afrashteh et al 11407035 - (D) ZECHER 102 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION SHEDRICK, CHARLES TERRELL

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3632 Ex Parte ELLIS et al 13329955 - (D) CUTITTA 112(2) 103 Southeast IP Group, LLC. MILLNER, MONICA E

3674 Ex Parte Clement et al 13153120 - (D) OSINSKI 102/103 DLA Piper LLP (US) Synthetic Genomics, Inc AHUJA, ANURADHA

3688 Ex Parte Boland et al 13297180 - (D) CRAWFORD 103 101 Facebook/Fenwiok PATEL, DIPEN M

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2631 Ex Parte Lerner et al 12842033 - (R) SAADAT 103 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED VARNDELL, ROSS E

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3774 Ex Parte Alley et al 13663282 - (R) SILVERMAN 103 BERKELEY LAW & TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLP WATKINS, MARCIA LYNN

No comments :