SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Showing posts with label atmel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atmel. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

atmel, Dossel

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2489 Ex Parte Newton et al 13809204 - (D) HUGHES 103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS HASAN, MAINUL

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2625 Ex Parte Reigneau 12973539 - (D) YAP 103 Slater Matsil, LLP/ST- EP ELNAFIA, SAIFELDIN E

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3656 Ex Parte Gila et al 12792301 - (D) ENGLE 112(2)/102 Patent Dept. - Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. YABUT, DANIEL D

In the context of a means-plus-function limitation, if one skilled in the art would be able to identity the structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function, then the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph are satisfied. See Atmel Corp. v. Info. Storage Devices, Inc., 198 F.3d 1374, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 1999); see also In re Dossel , 115 F.3d 942, 946-47 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

Atmel Corp. v. Information Storage Devices Inc., 198 F.3d 1374, 53 USPQ2d 1225 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 2163 2181

Dossel, In re, 115 F.3d 942, 42 USPQ2d 1881 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2181 2185

3656 Ex Parte Schena 12766794 - (D) ENGLE 102 Patent Dept. - Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. YABUT, DANIEL D

3663 Ex Parte Eckhoff et al 12387331 - (D) MARSCHALL 112(2)/103 Advent, LLP/INTELLECTUAL VENTURES NGUYEN, CUONG H

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Mettler 12013911 - (D) SCHOPFER 103 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A. SIMPSON, SARAH A

3786 Ex Parte HULDIN et al 14245141 - (D) HOSKINS 103 Miles & Stockbridge KINNARD, LISA M

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Adams et al 13347498 - (D) NEWMAN 103 112(1) NYEMASTER GOODE P.C. WESTERBERG, NISSA M

1618 Ex Parte BARRY et al 11833717 - (D) PRATS 103 103 SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLP RIDER, LANCE W

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2169 Ex Parte O'SULLIVAN et al 12102207 - (D) DIXON 103 103 STEVENS & SHOWALTER, L.L.P. WEINRICH, BRIAN E

2172 Ex Parte Carlsen et al 14004424 - (D) JIVANI 103 103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS ELL, MATTHEW

2197 Ex Parte Salle et al 12261989 - (D) YAP 103 103 Hewlett Packard Enterprise WHEATON, BRADFORD F

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2488 Ex Parte Yu et al 13863094 - (D) HAMANN 103 103 Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane PC Google Technology Holdings LLC LE, PETER D

2488 Ex Parte Yu et al 13863127 - (D) HAMANN 103 103 Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane PC Google Technology Holdings LLC LE, PETER D

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte Hatton 12607244 - (D) BEST 103 PPG Industries, Inc. TSCHEN, FRANCISCO W

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2136 Ex Parte Sampathkumar et al 13971114 - (D) SHIANG 103 SHERIDAN ROSS P.C. TSAI, SHENG JEN

2137 Ex Parte Cervera Navas 12733234 - (D) MOORE 102/103 Taylor English Duma / Seagate BONE, DUSTIN

2153 Ex Parte Anderson et al 13537911 - (D) YAP 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION CHOI, YUK TING

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2427 Ex Parte Gilje 13659417 - (D) STEPHENS 103 ARRIS Enterprises, LLC HUERTA, ALEXANDER Q

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2645 Ex Parte Hardt et al 12262465 - (D) MOORE 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C./FGTL DU, HUNG K

2658 Ex Parte Henry 13731565 - (D) COURTENAY 101 103 FALATI INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW SAINT CYR, LEONARD

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2836 Ex Parte Belz et al 12446116 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP AMRANY, ADI

2882 Ex Parte COHEN et al 13936010 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 Patti & Malvone Law Group, LLC KREUTZER, COLIN WRIGHT

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

baxter travenol, Net MoneyIN, atmel

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1786 Ex Parte Howard 12135254 - (D) ANKENBRAND 103 E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY THOMPSON, CAMIE S

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2433 Ex Parte Verma et al 12057950 - (D) FISHMAN 103 Whitham, Curtis, & Christofferson, P.C. ANDERSON, MICHAEL D

2481 Ex Parte Shlissel et al 10498888 - (D) NAPPI 103 Husch Blackwell LLP Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Welsh & Katz JONES, HEATHER RAE

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1789 Ex Parte Wesson et al 12089764 - (D) PAK 102/103 102/103 CARLSON GASKEY & OLDS GRAY, JILL M

“[E]xtrinsic evidence may be considered [in the anticipation rejection] when it is used to explain, but not expand, the meaning of a reference.” In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 390 (Fed. Cir. 1991). Nevertheless, “differences between the prior art reference and a claimed invention, however slight, invoke the question of obviousness, not anticipation.” Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2008). To prevail in an appeal to this Board, Appellant must adequately explain or identify reversible error in the Examiner’s § 102 rejections.

Baxter Travenol Labs., In re, 952 F.2d 388, 21 USPQ2d 1281 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 2131.01 2145

Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359, 88 USPQ2d 1751 (Fed. Cir. 2008) 2152.02(b)

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2443 Ex Parte Renschler et al 12134688 - (D) HORVATH 112(2)/103 112(2)/103 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED JOHN, CLARENCE

“[I]n order for a claim to meet the particularity requirement of ¶ 2, the corresponding structure(s) of a means-plus-function limitation must be disclosed in the written description in such a manner that one skilled in the art will know and understand what structure corresponds to the means limitation.” Atmel Corp. v. Information Storage Device, Inc., 198 F.3d 1374, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (emphasis added). The proper inquiry “asks first whether structure is described in the specification, and if so, whether one skilled in the art would identify the structure from that description.” Id. at 1381 (emphasis in original).

Atmel Corp. v. Information Storage Devices Inc., 198 F.3d 1374, 53 USPQ2d 1225 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 2181

2447 Ex Parte Archer et al 12060508 - (D) MOHANTY obviousness-type double patenting 103 IBM (ROC-BKLS) c/o Kennedy Lenart Spraggins LLP JOSHI, SURAJ M

2493 Ex Parte Aviles et al 12015197 - (D) MORGAN 103 103 Mahamedi Paradice LLP (NetApp) SHAW, PETER C

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1619 Ex Parte Weber et al 11352600 - (D) FREDMAN 103 L'Oreal USA VENKAT, JYOTHSNA A

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1715 Ex Parte Hicks et al 11833942 - (D) SMITH 103 Stolowitz Ford Cowger LLP LIGHTFOOT, ELENA TSOY

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2468 Ex Parte Chang et al 11751445 - (D) SILVERMAN 101 103 AT&T Legal Department - HFZ PHUNG, LUAT

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3634 Ex Parte Beachy 12774691 - (D) HOFFMANN 103 BELASCO, JACOBS & TOWNSLEY LLP CHIN-SHUE, ALVIN CONSTANTINE