SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Showing posts with label gore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gore. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

gore

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1717 Ex Parte Shekalim et al 12031407 - (D) BEST 103 VIDAS, ARRETT & STEINKRAUS, P.A. BOWMAN, ANDREW J

1764 Ex Parte Eagles 10717859 - (D) GAUDETTE 102/103 FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG KUMAR, PREETI

1764 Ex Parte EAGLES 12613223 - (D) GAUDETTE 102/103 FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG KUMAR, PREETI

1782 Ex Parte Chechan et al 12064086 - (D) KIMLIN 103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS LAN, YAN

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2446 Ex Parte Li et al 11678268 - (D) LORIN 103 MICROSOFT CORPORATION GILLIS, BRIAN J

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2834 Ex Parte Qu et al 12138182 - (D) BEST 112(1)/112(2)/102/103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (PCPI) C/O FLETCHER YODER ANDREWS, MICHAEL

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3618 Ex Parte Carter et al 11277029 - (D) BAHR 103 KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP RESTIFO, JEFFREY J

It is well settled that obviousness is not determined based on the gist of the invention. W.L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1548 (Fed. Cir. 1983).

W.L. Gore & Assoc., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 220 USPQ 303 (Fed. Cir. 1983)  2132,  2133.03(a),   2133.03(c)2141.012141.022144.082164.082165.04,2173.05(b)

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3765 Ex Parte Doty 11289958 - (D) CALVE 102/103 MOSER TABOADA MORAN, KATHERINE M

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3637 Ex Parte Bauer et al 10543118 - (D) ABRAMS 112(2) 102/103 BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION TRAN, HANH VAN

3638 Ex Parte Murray 11905989 - (D) SPAHN 103 112(2) Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP - iRobot SILBERMANN, JOANNE

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte Tulyani et al 11366768 - (D) GAUDETTE 103 BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C. c/o CPA Global attn. Pam Houser EMPIE, NATHAN H

1765 Ex Parte Jozef et al 12089822 - (D) LEBOVITZ 103 HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC SERGENT, RABON A

1774 Ex Parte van der POL et al 12019890 - (D) LEBOVITZ 103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS VANDEUSEN, CHRISTOPHER

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2444 Ex Parte Ruelas 12164061 - (D) HOELTER 101/102/103 IBM AUS IPLAW (GLF) c/o Garg Law Firm, PLLC PAPPAS, PETER

FEDERAL CIRCUIT

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2615 BOSE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND IMATION CORPORATION, MEMOREX PRODUCTS, INC., AND D.P.I., INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND 3XM CONSULTING, LLC, Defendant. 2013-1347 7,277,765 09/689,337 CLEVENGER SJ non-infringement SJ non-infringement Fish & Richardson, P.C.; Foley & Lardner LLP MEI, XU

VACATED AND REMANDED 
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2624 VEDERI, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. 2013-1057, -1296 7,239,760 11/130,004 7,577,316 11/761,361 7,805,025 12/482,314 7,813,596 12/482,284 RADER SJ non-infringement claim construction Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP; King & Spalding, LLP PATEL, KANJIBHAI B

DISMISSED
NISSIM CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEARPLAY, INC., LEE JARMAN, AND MATTHEW JARMAN, Defendants-Appellees 2013-1429 HUGHES collateral estoppel Carey Rodriguez Greenberg O’Keefe, LLP; The Storm Law Firm, PLLC

Thursday, May 2, 2013

miles labs, sensonics, gore, interconenct, energizer holdings

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering 
1791 Ex Parte Obermann 10492787 - (D) HASTINGS 112(2)/103 OSTROLENK FABER LLP DICUS, TAMRA

“The test for definiteness is whether one skilled in the art would understand the bounds of the claim when read in light of the specification. If the claims read in light of the specification reasonably apprise those skilled in the art of the scope of the invention, § 112 demands no more.” Miles Labs., Inc. v. Shandon, Inc., 997 F.2d 870, 875 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (citation omitted).

Miles Labs. Inc. v. Shandon Inc., 997 F.2d 870, 27 USPQ2d 1123 (Fed. Cir. 1993) 716.01(a)

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3665 Ex Parte Basir et al 11046523 - (D) KILE 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. MAWARI, REDHWAN K

To draw on knowledge of Appellants’ own invention, when the prior art does not contain or suggest that knowledge, is to use the invention as a template for its own reconstruction. Sensonics, Inc. v. Aerosonic Corp., 81 F.3d 1566, 1570 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (citing W.L. Gore & Assoc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1553 (Fed. Cir. 1983)). The invention must be viewed not after the blueprint has been drawn by the inventor, but as it would have been perceived in the state of the art that existed at the time the invention was made. Id. (citing with approval Interconnect Planning Corp. v. Feil, 774 F.2d 1132, 1138 (Fed. Cir. 1985)).

W.L. Gore & Assoc., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 220 USPQ 303 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 2132, 2133.03(a), 2133.03(c), 2141.01, 2141.02, 2144.08, 2164.08, 2165.04, 2173.05(b)

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3643 Ex Parte Castleberry 11258920 - (D) HOFFMANN 112(2)/102 102(2)/103 GIPPLE & HALE HAYES, KRISTEN C

If the scope of a claim would be reasonably ascertainable by those skilled in the art, then the claim is not indefinite. Energizer Holdings Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 435 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (holding that “anode gel” provided by implication the antecedent basis for “zinc anode”);

Energizer Holdings Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 435 F.3d 1366, 77 USPQ2d 1625 (Fed. Cir. 2006) 2173.05(e)

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering 
1763 Ex Parte Takagi et al 11887435 - (D) McKELVEY 103 HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. FINK, BRIEANN R

1764 Ex Parte Li et al 12165051 - (D) McKELVEY 103 FINA TECHNOLOGY INC BOYLE, ROBERT C

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2441 Ex Parte Lamoureux 11256327 - (D) ANDERSON 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY BATURAY, ALICIA

FEDERAL CIRCUIT

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
3628 2761 VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. v. SAP AMERICA, INC. 12-1029 6,553,350 09/253,427 5,878,400 08/664,837 RADER '350 permanent injunction infringement/damages '400 non-infringement McKool Smith, P.C., Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P. HAMILTON & TERRILE, LLP TERRILE, CANNATTI, CHAMBERS & HOLLAND, LLP POINVIL, FRANTZY HUGHET, WILLIAM N

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
1614 1614 ALLERGAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDOZ INC., ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH, LTD., ALCON, INC., AND FALCON PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., Defendants-Appellants, AND APOTEX INC. AND APOTEX CORP., Defendants-Appellants, AND WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. 11-1619 7,323,463 10/357,622 7,030,149 10/126,790 PROST concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part DYK '149 103 '463 103 Fish & Richardson P.C. Morrison & Foerster, LLP ALLERGAN, INC. ALLERGAN, INC. KWON, YONG SOK KWON, YONG SOK