SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Showing posts with label pearson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pearson. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

geisler, pearson

custom search


Reversed
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1637 Norman C. Nelson et al. 14342764 FLAX 102 Alston & Bird LLP/ Gen-Probe Incorporated CHUNDURU, SURYAPRABHA

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1721 Weiming Zhang et al. 13980459 FRANKLIN 103 BLANK ROME LLP GONZALEZ RAMOS, MAYLA

1723 Marko Lemke et al. 14037422 COLAIANNI 112(1)/112(2)/102/103 Viering, Jentschura & Partner mbB - Inf YANCHUK, STEPHEN J

1783 Tomoko Ichikawa et al. 14435793 FRANKLIN 103 BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP HANDVILLE, BRIAN

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2169 Andreas Wiegenstein et al. 13921834 BELISLE 103 CAESAR RIVISE, PC SKHOUN, HICHAM

2185 Le-Sheng Chou et al. 14865955 FISHMAN 102/103 Nixon Peabody LLP IRADUKUNDA, HERVE

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2443 Tomas Lundborg 14649237 CASS 103 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC MIRZA, ADNAN M

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2857 Tomy Varghese et al. 14276019 CASHION 101 WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION C/O BOYLE FREDRICKSON S.C KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG

2881 Zhongwei Chen et al. 14830062 DIXON 112(1)/103 Finnegan/ASML STOFFA, WYATT A
Reversed 3651 Russell J. Garehan 14748699 SONG 102 LAITRAM, L.L.C. SINGH, KAVEL

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3663 Andrew J. Graham et al. 14709077 KERINS 103 STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C. NGUYEN, CUONG H

3671 Scott Hacker et al. 14096873 SCHOPFER 103 HONEYWELL/LKGLOBAL HARTMANN, GARY S

3687 Robert William. Graham et al. 13730999 ADAMS dissenting KATZ 101 A PATENT LAWYER, LLC R WILLIAM GRAHAM DANZIG, REVA R

3688 Varouj A. Chitilian et al. 13474391 FRAHM 101/103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. SUMMERS, KIERSTEN V

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3732 Jordan Harden 14662058 HOSKINS 103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (SD) LYNCH, MEGAN E

3741 James Arthur. Simmons et al. 14831516 STAICOVICI 103 41.50 112(2) GE Power & Water Fletcher Yoder PC RODRIGUEZ, WILLIAM H

3754 Michael Paterson et al. 14845235 SONG 103 Burrus Intellectual Property Law Group LLC ROS, NICHOLAS A

Affirmed-in-Part
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1766 Dietrich Scherzer et al. 13268228 FRANKLIN 103 OTDP OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. KAHN, RACHEL

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2647 Elad Gil et al. 14329158 FRAHM 103 103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. JAIN, ANKUR

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2819 Sylvain Maitrejean et al. 14575329 HASTINGS 103 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. PARENDO, KEVIN A

Technical assertions unsupported by factual evidence are not persuasive.  In re Geisler, 116 F. 3d 1465, 1470 (Fed. Circ. 1997).  It has long been established that attorney’s arguments in a brief cannot take the place of evidence.  In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1405 (CCPA 1974). 

Geisler, In re, 116 F.3d 1465, 43 USPQ2d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2144.05 2145

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3627 Randy J. Templeton et al. 13987476 BENNETT 101 101/103 Sue Z. Shaper RACIC, MILENA

Affirmed
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1613 Adchara Pongpeerapat et al. 14505933 NEW 103 EPA - BOZICEVIC FIELD & FRANCIS LLP BOZICEVIC, FIELD & FRANCIS ARNOLD, ERNST V

1624 Shin Sugimoto 15514020 VALEK 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY

1627 Douglas Sears et al. 14046528 FREDMAN 103 Entralta P.C. RAMACHANDRAN, UMAMAHESWARI

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1781 Marcello Antonelli et al. 14357207 McMANUS 112(2)/103 Oppenhuizen Law PLC ZHANG, MICHAEL N

1781 Chunhe Zhang 14828583 GAUDETTE 103 CORNING INCORPORATED GUGLIOTTA, NICOLE T

1781 Krishan Lal. Luthra 14963878 COLAIANNI 103 Dority & Manning, P.A. and GEC-Aviation YANG, ZHEREN J

1784 Friedhelm Schmitz et al. 13701155 BEST 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION LA VILLA, MICHAEL EUGENE

1787 Jo Won. Lee et al. 14132325 SNAY 112(1) 103 Additon, Higgins & Pendleton, P.A. LOWREY, DANIEL D

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2119 Antonis Marinopoulos et al. 14341165 EVANS 103 ABB - Whitmyer IP Group LLC LINDSAY, BERNARD G

2158 Ling Qin. Zhang et al. 14508264 McNEILL 103 101 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP SHANMUGASUNDARAM, KANNAN

2415 Daniel Freeman et al. 14605793 BEAMER 102/103 OTDP DENTONS US LLP - Apple SIDDIQUI, KASHIF

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2465 Alfred Asterjadhi et al. 14531907 BELISLE 103 Patterson & Sheridan, L.L.P. Qualcomm THAI, CAMQUYEN

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3624 Devrim Varoglu et al. 13597894 FETTING 103 101/103 Apple - Blank Rome c/o Blank Rome LLP SADANANDA, ABHIJIT B

3626 Todd Reed. Henderson et al. 13169602 BISK 101 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. (Cerner Corporation) SEREBOFF, NEAL

3628 Dale Pollak 13444524 MEYERS 101 Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP / CEI NELSON, FREDA ANN

3628 Orhan Bulan et al. 13861553 CHUNG 101 LOZA & LOZA, LLP / Conduent ALLEN, AKIBA KANELLE

3649 Jacob A. Goble et al. 13838166 BAHR 103 Faegre Baker Daniels - W.L. Gore WEISBERG, AMY REGINA

3682 Subil M. Abraham et al. 14169614 ARPIN 101/102/103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J

3686 Jorn Op Den Buijs et al. 14070618 BUI 112(1) 101/103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS HEIN, DEVIN C

3687 Rohit Chauhan 14172311 DEJMEK 112(2)/101 103 BUCKLEY, MASCHOFF & TALWALKAR LLC LUDWIG, PETER L

3688 Brian Maw et al. 13895091 FISCHETTI 102/103 101 MasterCard c/o Ballard Spahr LLP VANDERHORST, MARIA VICTORIA

3696 Peter Hansen et al. 10825726 FETTING 101/103 IP GROUP OF DLA PIPER LLP (US) TROTTER, SCOTT S

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Larry Drake. Hansen 14257777 MARTIN 112(2)/102 Larry Drake Hansen ARYANPOUR, MITRA

3715 Bay Leaf. Raitt et al. 13034644 HILL 103 Seed IP Law Group/Valve (930181) GARNER, WERNER G

3715 Bay Leaf. Raitt et al. 13034652 HILL 103 Seed IP Law Group/Valve (930181) GARNER, WERNER G

3736 Sushant Trivedi et al. 15232007 STAICOVICI 102/103 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY GEHMAN, BRYON P

3745 Rohit Chouhan 13691478 KERINS 112(2)/103 112(1)/102 NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. BROWN, ADAM WAYNE

Rehearing Decision-Granted
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Heather N. Mendenhall et al. 13804781 MILLS 103 Intellectual Property Dept./DeWitt LLP Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation EBRAHIM, NABILA G

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2132 Robert Dale. Murphy et al. 13803015 CASS 103 Setter Roche LLP - Seagate GOLDSCHMIDT, CRAIG S

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

invitrogen, pearson

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1637 Ex Parte Nelson et al 13330745 - (D) NEWMAN 103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY CHUNDURU, SURYAPRABH

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3626 Ex Parte Skupin 12126584 - (D) FETTING 112(1)/112(2)/112(4)/101 Whitmyer IP Group LLC SEREBOFF, NEAL

3637 Ex Parte Kücük et al 13310822 - (D) FRAHM 103 BSH Home Appliances Corporation GALLEGO, ANDRES F

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3744 Ex Parte Fedorov 12331579 - (D) ASTORINO 103 THOMAS I HORSTEMEYER, LLP RUBY, TRAVIS C

3763 Ex Parte Ali et al 13096756 - (D) LENTIVECH 103 SHUMAKER & SIEFFERT , P.A STILES, AMBER R.

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2159 Ex Parte KIM et al 14039009 - (D) HOFF 103 103 VOLENTINE & WHITT PLLC HARMON, COURTNEY N

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3634 Ex Parte Adams et al 13681935 - (D) OSINSKI 103 103 OSTROLENK FABER LLP MITCHELL, KATHERINE W

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3745 Ex Parte Chamberlain et al 12847608 - (D) HOFFMANN 112(1)/103 103 BGL/Rolls-Royce Corporation SEABE, JUSTIN D

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1634 Ex Parte ARNOLD et al 14473114 - (D) LEBOVITZ 103 PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. HANEY, AMANDA MARIE

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1763 Ex Parte Hao et al 13069704 - (D) HOUSEL 103 FAY SHARPE LLP USELDING, JOHN E

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2137 Ex Parte Pangal et al 13627407 - (D) PYONIN 103 KACVINSKY DAISAK BLUNI PLLC BLUST, JASON W

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2477 Ex Parte JANG et al 13440216 - (D) HOWARD 103 Jefferson IP Law, LLP YOUNG, STEVE R

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3654 Ex Parte Hollowell et al 13872178 - (D) KERINS 112(2)/103 41.50 112(2) CARLSON GASKEY & OLDS KRUER, STEFAN

The Examiner is correct in noting that Appellants do not provide any evidence to support the statement that a continuous extrusion process would not easily be used with the teachings of Harper. Ans. 7. Invitrogen Corp. v. Clontech Labs, Inc., 429 F.3d 1052, 1068 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (unsubstantiated attorney argument is no substitute for competent evidence); In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1405 (CCPA 1974).

Invitrogen Corp. v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc., 429 F.3d 1052, 77 USPQ2d 1161 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 2138.04

3672 Ex Parte Holtzman et al 14057905 - (D) JESCHKE 103 Baker Botts L.L.P. WRIGHT, GIOVANNA COLLINS

3695 Ex Parte Lutnick et al 13912453 - (D) FETTING double patenting 101 CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P. SUBRAMANIAN, NARAYANSWAMY

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte FISCHER 13687060 - (D) WIEKER 103 MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC HOANG, MICHAEL G

3754 Ex Parte DELAGE 12783226 - (D) MURPHY 103 OLIFF PLC CHEYNEY, CHARLES

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2168 Ex Parte Itani et al 13714364 - (R) MORGAN 102/103 CRGO LAW JOHNSON, JOHNESE T

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2153 CISCO SYSTEMS INC., Requester, v. VIRNETX INC., Patent Owner. Ex Parte 7418504 et al 10714849 95001851 - (D) SIU 103 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP Third-Party Requester: HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP, IP SECTION FOSTER, ROLAND G original LIM, KRISNA

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2877 Ex parte M-I LLC and SCHLUMBERGER NORGE AS, Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 8427640 et al 13123541 90013474 - (D) SIU 112(1) 102/103 OSHA LIANG/MI THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER: Standley Law Group LLP LEE, CHRISTOPHER E original MERLINO, AMANDA H

Monday, May 16, 2011

meitzner, pearson, omega, raytek, CCS, bell atlantic

REVERSED

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1782 Ex Parte Zhong et al 10/811,277 HANLON 103(a) SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLC EXAMINER PATTERSON, MARC A

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2179 Ex Parte Windl 11/136,629 COURTENAY 102(e)/103(a) SIEMENS CORPORATION EXAMINER WIENER, ERIC A

REEXAMINATION

EXAMINER AFFIRMED-IN-PART
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3661 ELESYS NORTH AMERICA, INC. Requestor, Respondent v. AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. Patent Owner, Appellant 95/001,003 6,397,136 MEDLEY 112(2)/nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting/103(a) Brian Roffe, Esq. THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: Rickard K. DeMille BRINKS, HOFER, GILSON & LIONE EXAMINER TIBBITS, PIA FLORENCE original EXAMINER
ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE

Argument of counsel cannot take the place of evidence lacking in the record. Meitzner v. Mindick, 549 F.2d 775, 782 (CCPA 1977); see also In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1405 (CCPA 1974).

EXAMINER REVERSED

2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components

2821 RAYSPAN CORPORATION and Netgear, Inc., Appellant-Reexamination Requester, v. Patent 7,193,562 of RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC., Owner 95/001,078 7,193,562 TORCZON 102/103(a) For the requester: Thomas C. Reynolds, SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER For the owner: Steve Bachmann, CARR & FERRELL LLP For the Commissioner of Patents: Deandra M. Hughes, with Albert J. Gagliardi and Eric S. Keasel, ART UNIT 3992 EXAMINER HUGHES, DEANDRA M original EXAMINER CHEN, SHIH CHAO

AFFIRMED

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1763 Ex Parte English et al 11/818,103 PRATS 103(a) THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY EXAMINER ASDJODI, MOHAMMAD REZA

1782 Ex Parte Elder et al 11/344,992 LANE 112(1)/103(a) CARSTENS & CAHOON, LLP EXAMINER THAKUR, VIREN A

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2441 Ex Parte St. Pierre et al 10/206,932 COURTENAY 103(a) MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP EXAMINER BATURAY, ALICIA

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has determined that an express intent to confer on the claim language the novel meaning imparted by the negative limitation is required, such as an express disclaimer or independent lexicography in the written description that provides support for the negative limitation. Omega Engineering, Inc, v. Raytek Corp., 334 F.3d 1314, 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (citations omitted):

Beyond the words of the claim, neither the district court nor Raytek has identified any express disclaimer or independent lexicography in the written description that would justify adding that negative limitation. See CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp., 288 F.3d 1359, 1366-67 (Fed. Cir. 2002). Our independent review of the patent document, see Bell Atl. Network Servs., Inc. v. Covad Communications Group, Inc., 262 F.3d 1258, 1266 (Fed. Cir. 2001), reveals no express intent to confer on the claim language the novel meaning imparted by this negative limitation. Accordingly, we must conclude that there is no basis in the patent specification for adding the negative limitation.

2600 Communications
2617 Ex Parte Wong et al 10/519,278 MANTIS MERCADER 103(a) MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVEC, P.A. EXAMINER MILLER, BRANDON J

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3628 Ex Parte Dettinger et al 10/870,375 KIM 103(a) IBM CORPORATION EXAMINER JOSEPH, TONYA S

REHEARING

DENIED
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1781 Ex Parte Baeremaecker et al 10/968,130 WALSH 103(a) SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP EXAMINER DEES, NIKKI H


NEW

REVERSED

3761 Ex Parte Erspamer et al 10/135,936 McCARTHY 103(a) BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. EXAMINER STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F

3774 Ex Parte Lane et al 11/069,457 McCARTHY 103(a) Medtronic CardioVascular EXAMINER GANESAN, SUBA

1726 Ex Parte Ujiie et al 10/399,343 KRATZ 103(a) SNR DENTON US LLP EXAMINER DOVE, TRACY MAE

AFFIRMED

1781 Ex Parte Lundberg et al 11/484,263 OWENS 103(a) Mark A. Litman & Associates, P.A. EXAMINER CHAWLA, JYOTI

3686 Ex Parte Schoenberg 10/315,514 MOHANTY 103(a) King & Spalding LLP (Trizetto Customer Number) EXAMINER RANGREJ, SHEETAL

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

miller labs., pearson, sinex, hack, benner, yoder

REVERSED

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2189 Ex Parte Meiri et al 11/324,766 SIU 102(b)/103(a) MUIRHEAD AND SATURNELLI, LLC EXAMINER MACKALL, LARRY T

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3652 Ex Parte Brooks et al 10/520,499 O’NEILL 103(a) MACMILLAN SOBANSKI & TODD, LLC EXAMINER UNDERWOOD, DONALD W

3612 Ex Parte Nakajima et al 11/052,795 O’NEILL 112(2) MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP EXAMINER PATEL, KIRAN B

Miles Labs., Inc. v. Shandon, Inc., 997 F.2d 870, 875 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (if the claims “reasonably apprise those skilled in the art of the scope of the invention, § 112 demands no more”)

Miles Labs. Inc. v. Shandon Inc., 997 F.2d 870, 27 USPQ2d 1123 (Fed. Cir. 1993). . . . . . . . . . . . . . .716.01(a)

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3721 Ex Parte Larkin et al 11/215,794 O’NEILL 103(a) HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C. EXAMINER WEEKS, GLORIA R

3753 Ex Parte Ngo et al 11/735,941 BAHR 103(a) PATTERSON & SHERIDAN, LLP - - APPM/TX EXAMINER MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M


AFFIRMED-IN-PART

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1634 Ex Parte WANG et al 11/850,160 ADAMS 102(b) PHILIP S. JOHNSON EXAMINER BAUSCH, SARAE L

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2171 Ex Parte Ma et al 10/409,717 JEFFERY 102/103(a) LARSON NEWMAN, LLP EXAMINER NUNEZ, JORDANY

2192 Ex Parte Hughes et al 10/706,848 JEFFERY 112(2)/103(a) Siemens Corporation EXAMINER KISS, ERIC B


2600 Communications
2617 Ex Parte Moore et al 11/131,311 NAPPI 102(e) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXAMINER FIGUEROA, MARISOL

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3657 Ex Parte Yuda et al 11/374,702 O’NEILL 103(a) RANKIN, HILL & CLARK LLP EXAMINER WILLIAMS, THOMAS J

In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1403 (CCPA 1974) (intended use of an old composition does not render composition claim patentable); In re Zierden, 411 F.2d 1325, 1328 (CCPA 1969) (“[M]ere statement of a new use for an otherwise old or obvious composition cannot render a claim to the composition patentable.”); In re Sinex, 309 F.2d 488, 492 (CCPA 1962) (statement of intended use in an apparatus claim failed to distinguish over the prior art apparatus); In re Hack, 245 F.2d 246, 248 (CCPA 1957) (“the grant of a patent on a composition or a machine cannot be predicated on a new use of that machine or composition”); In re Benner, 174 F.2d 938, 942 (CCPA 1949) (“no provision has been made in the patent statutes for granting a patent upon an old product based solely upon discovery of a new use for such product”).

Hack, In re, 245 F.2d 246, 114 USPQ 161 (CCPA 1957). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2112.02

AFFIRMED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1623 Ex Parte Greve et al 10/984,628 FREDMAN 103(a) Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLPEXAMINER BLAND, LAYLA D

See In re Yoder, 204 Ct. Cl. 931 (Ct. Cl. 1974)(“While we traditionally do not require administrative proceedings to comply strictly with judicial rules of evidence, we have recognized that the probative value of uncorroborated hearsay may be insufficient to constitute substantial evidence supporting an administrative determination.”)


2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2155 Ex Parte Gutta et al 09/875,594 STEPHENS 102(e) PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS EXAMINER WOO, ISAAC M

2197 Ex Parte WANG et al 10/818,760 HOMERE 103(a) CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A. EXAMINER RUTTEN, JAMES D

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2443 Ex Parte Mathur et al 09/817,917 COURTENAY 101/103(a) Vedder Price PC EXAMINER SHIN, KYUNG H

2452 Ex Parte Apostolopoulos et al 10/683,136 MacDONALD 103(a) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXAMINER DAILEY, THOMAS J

2600 Communications 2613 Ex Parte Young 11/111,279 MacDONALD 102(b)/103(a) WITHROW & TERRANOVA, P.L.L.C. EXAMINER VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Jansen et al 10/063,125 O’NEILL 112(2)/103(a) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (BO) EXAMINER SEVERSON, RYAN J
REHEARING

DENIED

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering

1716 Ex Parte Teutsch et al 10/399,547 HASTINGS 103(a) Greenblum & Bernstein EXAMINER MOORE, KARLA A