PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

bond

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1773 Ex Parte Marteleur 12090267 - (D) METZ 103 GE HEALTHCARE BIO-SCIENCES CORP. HAMMOND, CHARLES

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3655 Ex Parte Gitt 11478452 - (D) MORRISON 102/103 KLAUS J. BACH KNIGHT, DEREK DOUGLAS

3691 Ex Parte Foth et al 10256737 - (D) KIM 112(1)/103 PITNEY BOWES INC. TINKLER, MURIEL S

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Holverson et al 11871769 - (D) PLENZLER 103 CORRIGAN LAW OFFICE JENNISON, BRIAN W

3767 Ex Parte Kumar et al 11211562 - (D) SNEDDEN 112(1)/112(2)/103 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP THOMAS, JR, BRADLEY G

3776 Ex Parte Parker 11316176 - (D) MARTIN 102/103 TAYLOR IP, P.C. STEITZ, RACHEL RUNNING

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2163 Ex Parte Cheung et al 10918899 - (D) ANDERSON 102 102 LAW OFFICE OF JIM BOICE BROWN, SHEREE N

2164 Ex Parte Bird et al 11289065 - (D) ANDERSON 112(2)/103 103 IBM CORP (YA) C/O YEE & ASSOCIATES PC KUDDUS, DANIEL A

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2456 Ex Parte Morris 11096764 - (D) CLEMENTS 103 103 SCENERA RESEARCH, LLC BARQADLE, YASIN M

However, there is no ipsissimis verbis test for determining whether a reference discloses a claim element, i.e., identity of terminology is not required. In re Bond, 910 F.2d 831, 832 (Fed. Cir. 1990). The recited “serventity” is “for receiving the request from the network via a presence protocol, routing the request to the service user agent associated with the requested service and returning a result generated by the requested service to the requesting device.” Claim 80.

Bond, In re, 910 F.2d 831, 15 USPQ2d 1566 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 2131, 2183, 2184

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Tavares et al 11697007 - (D) BROWN 102/103 102/103 BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD. HUNTER, ALVIN A

3788 Ex Parte Rathert 11847398 - (D) STAICOVICI 103 103 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated PERREAULT, ANDREW D

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1754 Ex Parte BASOL 11560321 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP (SV) LEADER, WILLIAM T

1767 Ex Parte Spyrou et al 12440927 - (D) TORCZON 112(1)/103 OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. ROSWELL, JESSICA MARIE

1782 Ex Parte Martin et al 11640462 - (D) McKELVEY 103 DORITY & MANNING, P.A. RAUDENBUSH, ELLEN SUZANNE

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2482 Ex Parte Mills 10802451 - (D) DANG 103 Tyco Fire Protection Gerald M. Bluhm FINDLEY, CHRISTOPHER G

2494 Ex Parte Busboom et al 10513212 - (D) CLEMENTS 102 ERICSSON INC. ABRISHAMKAR, KAVEH

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2677 Ex Parte Stamm et al 11312921 - (D) FISHMAN 103 MICROSOFT CORPORATION WANG, JIN CHENG

2679 Ex Parte Maystrovsky et al 10839033 - (D) CLEMENTS 103 HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C. HAJNIK, DANIEL F

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3646 Ex Parte Cantonwine et al 12153415 - (D) GERSTENBLITH 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C. O'CONNOR, MARSHALL P

3689 Ex Parte Bresniker et al 10678464 - (D) FETTING 112(2)/102/103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY NGUYEN, THUY-VI THI

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 Ex Parte Hyland et al 10720404 - (D) DIXON 103 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP HILLERY, NATHAN

3742 Ex Parte Entenman et al 11818880 - (D) HORNER 102/103 TERRANCE A. MEADOR INCAPLAW CAMPBELL, THOR S

3761 Ex Parte Lieponis 11384843 - (D) PLENZLER 103 ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS, LLC TREYGER, ILYA Y

REEXAMINATION  

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2181 RAMBUS INC. Patent Owner, Appellant v. NVIDIA CORPORATION Requester 95001188 6304937 09/669,295 EASTHOM 103 Paul M. Anderson, PLLC Third Party Requester: Novak Druce & Quigg, LLP ESCALANTE, OVIDIO original AUVE, GLENN ALLEN

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3764 ADIDAS AG Requester v. NIKE, INC. Patent Owner and Appellant 95001198 6716139 09/712,086 GUEST 112(1)/103 BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD. THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER: STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX, PLLC GRAHAM, MATTHEW C original RICHMAN, GLENN E
 
REHEARING  

GRANTED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 NUVASIVE, INC. Requester, Appellant v. Patent of WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. Patent Owner, Respondent 95000448 6969390 10/386,275 SONG 103 MARTIN & FERRARO, LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER; FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. CLARK, JEANNE MARIE original REIP, DAVID OWEN

FEDERAL CIRCUIT

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2876 ALEXSAM, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. IDT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. 2012-1063, -1064 6,000,608 08/891,261 DYK Dissenting MAYER infringement judgment of no invalidity/infringement/noninfringement Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP; Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott, LLP original WOOD, PHILLIPS, KATZ, CLARK & MORTIMER FELTEN, DANIEL S

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1612; 1625 AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND AMR TECHNOLOGY, INC., (now known as Albany Molecular Research, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMINO CHEMICALS LTD., DIPHARMA FRANCIS, SR.L., AND DIPHARMA SPA, Defendants-Appellees, AND MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant. AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND AMR TECHNOLOGY, INC., (now known as Albany Molecular Research, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendants, AND AMINO CHEMICALS LTD., DIPHARMA FRANCIS, SR.L., AND DIPHARMA SPA, Defendants-Appellees. 2011-1335,-1336 5,750,703 08/382,649 7,390,906 11/455,531 REYNA Dissenting BRYSON Markman opinion misinterpreted claim terms McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP; Arent Fox LLP original SANOFI; HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI PC CHANG, CELIA C

1613; 1614; 1614 DEY, L.P., DEY, INC., AND MYLAN, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (formerly known as Sepracor, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee. 2012-1428 6,040,344 09/083,010 7,348,362 10/887,785; 7,462,645 11/688,429; 7,465,756 11/688,436; 7,473,710 11/688,450; and 7,541,385 11/688,463 BRYSON Dissenting NEWMAN summary judgment of invalidity Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP; Paul Hastings, LLP original HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.; MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP; LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP SACKEY, EBENEZER O; HENLEY III, RAYMOND J; HENLEY III, RAYMOND J

No comments :