PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Thursday, March 20, 2014

self, thrift

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2142 Ex Parte Betts et al 11134865 - (D) FISCHETTI 103 Baker Botts LLP STEVENS, ROBERT

2165 Ex Parte McQuarrie 12069548 - (D) BUI 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 102 Wolfe-SBMC CHBOUKI, TAREK

2168 Ex Parte Fredrickson et al 12032329 - (D) STRAUSS 102 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 102/103 CRGO LAW EHICHIOYA, IRETE FRED

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2645 Ex Parte Zhang 10594646 - (D) JEFFERY 103 Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd (for Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd) NGO, CHUONG A

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2835 Ex Parte Stefanoski 12208670 - (D) PRAISS 102/103 PATTERSON & SHERIDAN, LLP/NVIDIA SMITH, COURTNEY L

2895 Ex Parte Maier et al 11521087 - (D) HANLON 102/103 Maginot, Moore & Beck JUNG, MICHAEL

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte OSULLIVAN et al 11428233 - (D) BROWNE 103 LOTUS AND RATIONAL SOFTWARE FEACHER, LORENA R

3674 Ex Parte Sponchia 12140742 - (D) GERSTENBLITH 102 CANTOR COLBURN LLP BATES, ZAKIYA W

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1775 Ex Parte Augenstein 11975234 - (D) NAGUMO 103 103 MCTAVISH PATENT FIRM BEISNER, WILLIAM H

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1787 Ex Parte Maly et al 11648494 - (D) GAUDETTE 103 HARTMAN GLOBAL IP LAW SHOSHO, CALLIE E

1791 Ex Parte Shimizu et al 11094167 - (D) GAUDETTE 103 Cheng Law Group, PLLC DEES, NIKKI H

Arguments in support of patentability must be based on claim limitations. In re Self, 671 F.2d 1344, 1348 (CCPA 1982) (“Many of appellant’s arguments fail from the outset because, . . . they are not based on limitations appearing in the claims.”).

Self, In re, 671 F.2d 1344, 213 USPQ 1 (CCPA 1982) 2131.05

see also, In re Thrift, 298 F.3d 1357, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (explaining that when a second reference identifies the benefits of adding a feature to the primary reference, an obviousness rejection is proper)

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2176 Ex Parte Murata 11498293 - (D) GRIMES 102/103 Adobe / Finch & Maloney PLLC BURKE, TIONNA M

2192 Ex Parte Rao et al 11637435 - (D) COURTENAY 103 Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton/Qualcomm DAM, TUAN QUANG

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2421 Ex Parte Schwartz 11821465 - (D) KUMAR 102/103 DeLizio Gilliam, PLLC NGUYEN BA, HOANG VU A

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2655 Ex Parte Sutardja et al 12157909 - (D) EVANS 103 HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE P.L.C. SELLERS, DANIEL R

2666 Ex Parte Wheeler et al 11220496 - (D) DANG 102/103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY FUJITA, KATRINA R

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3782 Ex Parte Howell 11985469 - (D) SPAHN 103 McCarter & English LLP ACCOUNT: ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC. PASCUA, JES F

No comments :