PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Friday, February 13, 2015

sinclair

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1622 Ex Parte Castillo et al 12119212 - (D) GRIMES 103 PROTEOTECH, INC. COVINGTON, RAYMOND K

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte Fairbourn et al 11721532 - (D) SMITH 102/103 103 WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP EMPIE, NATHAN H

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1616 Ex Parte Rosinger et al 11482087 - (D) FREDMAN 103 NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP PRYOR, ALTON NATHANIEL

1617 Ex Parte Fares et al 12112375 - (D) FREDMAN 103 L'Oreal USA BUCKLEY, AUDREA

1625 Ex Parte Marmsater et al 12593041 - (D) GRIMES 103 VIKSNINS HARRIS & PADYS PLLP ROZOF, TIMOTHY R

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1783 Ex Parte Padiyath et al 11752368 - (D) GARRIS 103 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY JOHNSON, NANCY ROSENBERG

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Dheap et al 11779929 - (D) KUMAR 103 DELIZIO GILLIAM, PLLC IBM RALEIGH IPLAW (DG) LU, CHARLES EDWARD

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2438 Ex Parte Whang et al 11870694 - (D) BRANCH 103 GARLICK & MARKISON (ALU) JEUDY, JOSNEL

2439 Ex Parte Faynberg et al 12100777 - (D) CURCURI 101/102/103 RYAN, MASON & LEWIS, LLP SCHMIDT, KARI L

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3732 Ex Parte DeSimone et al 11947172 - (D) PAULRAJ 103 Myers Bigel Sibley & Sajovec, P.A. PATEL, YOGESH P

The Examiner thus, relies upon Hydex 301® as a prior art rigid polyurethane possessing the claimed properties, and asserts that it would have been obvious to select that material for the dental appliance of Tadros “since the selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use support[s] a prima facie obviousness determination” (id., citing Sinclair & Carroll co. v. International Corp., 325 U.S. 327 (1945)). 

Based on the cited teachings of the prior art (FF1–7), we determine that a prima facie case of obviousness has been made.

Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945) 2144.07

3762 Ex Parte Libbus et al 11746263 - (D) MILLS 102 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A. HOLMES, REX R

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2424 Ex Parte Deutmeyer et al 11052265 - (D) WEINSCHENK 103 MENDELSOHN, DRUCKER, & DUNLEAVY, P.C. FLYNN, RANDY A

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2131 RESEARCH IN MOTION Third Party Requester v. INNOVATIVE SONIC LIMITED Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 6925183 et al 09/682,310 95002147 - (D) BAUMEISTER 102/103 Blue Capital Law Firm, P.C. THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP CARLSON, JEFFREY D original SHERKAT, AREZOO

No comments :