PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

ICON

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2842 Ex Parte TOBITA et al 13455808 - (D) FINK 102 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. LAM, TUAN THIEU

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3688 Ex Parte Kane 12633064 - (D) MEDLOCK 102/103 102/103 ZARLEY LAW FIRM P.L.C. MACASIANO, MARILYN G

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1733 Ex Parte Takagi et al 12604858 - (D) WILSON 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. MORILLO, JANELL COMBS

It is well established that "the PTO must give claims their broadest reasonable construction consistent with the specification. Therefore, we look to the specification to see if it provides a definition for claim terms, but otherwise apply a broad interpretation." In re ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (emphasis added).

No comments :