1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
Ex Parte Goldberg et al PRATS 102(b)/103(a) UNILEVER PATENT GROUP
Ex Parte Ramji et al GREEN 103(a) THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Ex Parte Zauderer et al SCHEINER 103(a) STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
Ex Parte Ko KRATZ 103(a) THE WEBB LAW FIRM, P.C.
Ex Parte Duffy KRATZ 112(1)/102(b) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC
When the original written description describes something within the scope of the claim, the Examiner must do more than point out the difference in scope. This is so because "that a claim may be broader than the specific embodiment disclosed in a specification is in itself of no moment." In re Rasmussen, 650 F.2d 1212, 1215 (CCPA 1981). There are instances in which a narrower disclosure can support broader claims. Id.
Rasmussen, In re, 650 F.2d 1212, 211 USPQ 323 (CCPA 1981) . . 706.03(o), 1504.04, 2163, 2163.01, 2163.04, 2163.05, 2163.06
Ex Parte Barhorst et al GARRIS 103(a) HOUSTON ELISEEVA
Ex Parte Chandhoke et al BARRY 102(e)/103(a) MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & GOETZEL, P.C.
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
Ex Parte Nazzal WHITEHEAD, JR. 103(a) Riverbed Technology Inc. - PVF c/o Park, Vaughan & Fleming LLP
2600 Communications
Ex Parte Burbidge et al NAPPI 102(e)/103(a) MOTOROLA INC
2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Ex Parte Zheng BAUMEISTER 103(a)/102(e) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) INTEL/BSTZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP
Any judgment on obvious that is based on knowledge gleaned solely from Appellant’s disclosure is improper. In re McLaughlin, 443 F.2d 1392, 1395, (CCPA 1971).
McLaughlin, In re, 443 F.2d 1392, 170 USPQ 209 (CCPA 1971) . . . . . 707.07(f), 2145
Ex Parte Lan et al HAHN 102(b)/103(a) SPANSION LLC C/O MURABITO , HAO & BARNES, L.L.P3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
Ex Parte Francis CRAWFORD 102(e) WELSH & FLAXMAN, LLC
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
Ex Parte Carstens SONG 102(b)/103(a) Hasse & Nesbitt LLC
Ex Parte Kucera et al BAHR 102(b)/103(a) WARN, HOFFMANN, MILLER & LALONE, .P.C
Ex Parte Olson et al PATE III 102(a)/102(b)/103(a) ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
Ex Parte Schalk O’NEILL 103(a) COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE LLP
Ex Parte Wong McCARTHY 103(a) SHOEMAKER AND MATTARE, LTD.
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
Ex Parte Wollenberg WALSH 103(a) M. CARMEN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
Ex Parte Gonska BAHR 103(a) CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C.
Ex Parte Katzenmaier et al TURNER 103(a) 3m Innovative Properties Company
Ex Parte Post et al PATE 112(1)/103(a) RANKIN, HILL & CLARK LLP
No comments :
Post a Comment