SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

wilson, lukach

REVERSED

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2166 Ex Parte Dettinger et al 10/460,589 DIXON 103(a) 37 CFR § 41.50(b) 112(2)/112(1) William J. McGinnis, Jr. IBM Corporation EXAMINER AHLUWALIA, NAVNEET K

As the court in In re Wilson, 424 F.2d 1382 (CCPA 1970) stated:

[a]ll words in a claim must be considered in judging the patentability of that claim against the prior art. If no reasonably definite meaning can be ascribed to certain terms in the claim, the subject matter does not become obvious -- the claim becomes indefinite.

Wilson, In re, 424 F.2d 1382, 165 USPQ 494, (CCPA 1970).. . . . . . . . . . . .2143.03, 2173.06

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2447 Ex Parte Tindal et al 09/730,680 BARRY 103(a) IBM CORP. (WIP) c/o WALDER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C. EXAMINER WANG, LIANG CHE A

AFFIRMED-IN-PART

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3622 Ex Parte Srinivasan et al 11/183,141 FETTING 103(a) 103(a) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103(a) CLARENCE E. ERIKSEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. EXAMINER AHMED, AFFAF

3644 Ex Parte McMurray et al 11/669,595 GREENHUT 103(a) 103(a) MCGUIREWOODS, LLP EXAMINER NGUYEN, TRINH T


AFFIRMED

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2447 Ex Parte Bourges-Waldegg et al 10/636,004 HOMERE 103(a) IBM EXAMINER NEURAUTER, GEORGE C

2600 Communications
2611 Ex Parte Leonard et al 10/446,994 HOFF 103(a) CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. EXAMINER DSOUZA, JOSEPH FRANCIS A

2614 Ex Parte Feit et al 10/638,641 FRAHM 103(a) PLUMSEA LAW GROUP, LLC EXAMINER SUTHERS, DOUGLAS JOHN

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3661 Ex Parte Ramaswamy et al 10/064,894 GREENHUT 112(1)/103(a) BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C./FGTL EXAMINER BEHNCKE, CHRISTINE M

New or amended claims which introduce elements or limitations which are not supported by the as-filed disclosure violate the written description requirement. See, e.g., In re Lukach, 442 F.2d 967, 968-69 (CCPA 1971)

Lukach, In re, 442 F.2d 967, 169 USPQ 795 (CCPA 1971) . . . . . . . . .201.11, 2163, 2163.05

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3788 Ex Parte Boozer et al 11/249,093 CALVE 103(a) Larson & Anderson, LLC EXAMINER NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA

No comments :