SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Monday, September 10, 2012

anderson, brink

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1765 Ex Parte Guisinger et al 12109991 - (D) BEST 102 CURATOLO SIDOTI CO., LPA POURBOHLOUL, SARIRA CAMILLA

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2164 Ex Parte Ougarov et al 11035774 - (D) NAPPI 103 BUCKLEY, MASCHOFF & TALWALKAR LLC KHOSHNOODI, FARIBORZ

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3687 Ex Parte Lin 11025133 - (D) ROBERTSON 112(1)/103 FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C. IWARERE, OLUSEYE

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte MOODY 11951303 - (D) SPAHN 103 JOHN EDWARD ROETHEL LAYNO, BENJAMIN

3734 Ex Parte Ungs 11184644 - (D) FREDMAN 102 SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLC STRANSKY, KATRINA MARIE

See In re Brink, 419 F.2d 914, 917 (CCPA 1970) (“if a reference is ambiguous and can be interpreted so that it may or may no [sic] constitute an anticipation of an appellant's claims, an anticipation rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 based upon the ambiguous reference is improper.”).

3734 Ex Parte Copa et al 10919775 - (D) WALSH 102/103 KAGAN BINDER, PLLC Dowe, Katherine

3762 Ex Parte Sommer et al 10635166 - (D) WALSH 102/103 Medtronic Inc. Alter, Alyssa

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3749 Ex Parte Nguyen 11888489 - (D) KAMHOLZ 103 HITT GAINES P.C. KAMPS, FRANCES H

3762 Ex Parte Adib 10942622 - (D) FREDMAN 132(a)/112(1) CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, KINDNESS, PLLC HOLMES, REX R  

“The question … is not whether "carrying" was a word used in the specification as filed but whether there is support in the specification for employment of the term in a claim; is the concept of carrying present in the original disclosure?” In re Anderson, 471 F.2d 1237, 1244 (CCPA 1973). “Mere rephrasing of a passage does not constitute new matter. Accordingly, a rewording of a passage where the same meaning remains intact is permissible.” MPEP § 2163.07.  

Anderson, In re, 471 F.2d 1237, 176 USPQ 331 (CCPA 1973) . . . . . . 2163.07, 2181

No comments :