SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Showing posts with label kaslow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kaslow. Show all posts

Thursday, February 8, 2018

kaslow, lizardtech

custom search

REVERSED
3685 Ex Parte Yang 11901205 - (D) MacDONALD 103 Tarolli, Sundheim, Co veil & Tummino LLP/Imagine Corporation HUANG, TSAN-YU J

3745 Ex Parte Whitehurst et al 13459748 - (D) PESLAK 112(1)/103 41.50 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY MIKUS, JASON

In order to comply with the written description requirement, the Specification “must describe the invention sufficiently to convey to a person of skill in the art that the patentee had possession of the claimed invention at the time of the application, i.e., that the patentee invented what is claimed.” LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc., 424 F.3d 1336, 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2005). 

The Federal Circuit has explained that: The test for determining compliance with the written description requirement is whether the disclosure of the application as originally filed reasonably conveys to the artisan that the inventor had possession at that time of the later claimed subject matter, rather than the presence or absence of literal support in the specification for the claim language. . . . The content of the drawings may also be considered in determining compliance with the written description requirement. In re Kaslow, 707 F.2d 1366, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (citations omitted).

LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc., 424 F.3d 1336, 76 USPQ2d 1724 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 2161.01 2163

Kaslow, In re, 707 F.2d 1366, 217 USPQ 1089 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 706.03(v) 2141.02 2161.01 2163.02

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
2172 Ex Parte Pan 12739735 - (D) WINSOR 103 103 IPR WORKS, LLC HUR, ECE

2659 Ex Parte Naik 13411180 - (D) BEAMER 103 103 DENTONS US LLP - Apple HAN, QI

3674 Ex Parte Pisklak et al 14048463 - (D) DOUGAL 112(2)/103 103 Turney LLP - HES AHUJA, ANURADHA

3744 Ex Parte Kempes et al 14241343 - (D) HILL 103 103 SHELL OIL COMPANY PETTITT, JOHN F

3772 Ex Parte Haines 13005778 - (D) PESLAK 112(2)/103 103 41.50 103 Burrus Intellectual Property Law Group LLC PATEL, TARLA R

AFFIRMED
1631 Ex Parte Friedlander et al 13870324 - (D) FLAX 101 Brown & Michaels (END) NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT

1644 Ex Parte Low et al 13463447 - (D) SCHNEIDER 103 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (IN) BELYAVSKYI, MICHAIL A

1644 Ex Parte Zang 12777487 - (D) KATZ 101 Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP EWOLDT, GERALD R

1716 Ex Parte Schauer et al 12892201 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. NUCKOLS, TIFFANY Z

1722 Ex Parte Cho et al 14020343 - (D) OWENS 103 The Dow Chemical Company/Cantor Colburn LLP WALKE, AMANDA C

2132 Ex Parte Pan 13750896 - (D) MacDONALD 103 Hewlett Packard Enterprise PEREZ-VELEZ, ROCIO DEL MAR

2174 Ex Parte Mairs et al 13972417 - (D) CRAIG 103 IR HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. KUMAR, ANIL N

2449 Ex Parte Shukla et al 14087558 - (D) PINKERTON 103 Wolfe-SBMC KHAN, ATTA

3627 Ex Parte Porter et al 14489279 - (D) HUME 103 101 Dodd Call Black, PLLC ADE, OGER GARCIA

REHEARING

DENIED
2114 Ex Parte Biazetti et al 12347108 - (R) STEPHENS 103 CRGO LAW KUDIRKA, JOSEPH R