101 training

custom search

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2448 Ex Parte Chen et al 12207005 - (D) FETTING 102 101 IBM CORPORATION- AUSTIN (JVL) COX, NATISHA D

We note Appellants are not precluded from amending the claims toovercome the rejection. Relevant guidance is in the 1351 Off. Gaz. Pat.Office 212 (“A claim drawn to such a computer readable medium that covers both transitory and non-transitory embodiments may be amended to narrow the claim to cover only statutory embodiments to avoid a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 by adding the limitation ‘non-transitory’ to the claim.”); USPTO, Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (August 2012 Update) (pp. 11-14), available at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/101_training_aug2012.pdf (noting that while “non-transitory” is a viable option for overcoming the presumption that the media encompass signals or carrier waves, merely indicating that such media are “physical” or “tangible” will not overcome such presumption) (emphasis added). See id. at 14.

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1765 Ex Parte Ludewig et al 11243126 - (D) KIMLIN 112(1)/103 NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP SERGENT, RABON A

1791 Ex Parte Kaouas et al 12065189 - (D) KIMLIN 103 CURATOLO SIDOTI CO., LPA DEES, NIKKI H

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2181 Ex Parte Finnerty et al 10748352 - (D) BRADEN 103 CAMPBELL STEPHENSON LLP LEE,CHUN KUAN

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3646 Ex Parte KIRCHNER et al 12138722 - (D) GREENHUT 103 GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C. GALT, CASSI J

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3645 Ex Parte Grasmueck 11381159 - (D) GREENHUT 112(2)/103 CRGO LAW HELLNER, MARK

ricoh

custom search

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1657 Ex Parte Hayek et al 12371266 - (D) NEW 101/obviousness-type double patenting 103 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY GITOMER, RALPH J

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1771 Ex Parte Shaw et al 11436779 - (D) GARRIS 103 INFINEUM USA L.P GOLOBOY, JAMES C

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2837 Ex Parte Mallett et al 12271097 - (D) HASTINGS 103 SCHIFF HARDIN, LLP ROJAS, BERNARD

Notably, our reviewing court has determined that a reference can distinguish prior art in order to show the novelty of an invention without teaching away from combining the prior art with the invention disclosed in the reference. See Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Quanta Computer Inc., 550 F.3d 1325, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3672 Ex Parte Ramsey 11891168 - (D) GOODSON 103 WOOD, PHILLIPS, KATZ, CLARK & MORTIMER SINGH, SUNIL

AFFIRMED-IN-PART 
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3716 Ex Parte Chow et al 11059781 - (D) BROWNE 103 101 George Elias D'AGOSTINO, PAUL ANTHONY

carnegie

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2176 Ex Parte Trotto et al 11563965 - (D) PAULRAJ 102/103 EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC DYER, ANDREW R

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2453 Ex Parte Sano et al 10882736 - (D) STAICOVICI 103 RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP FABBRI, ANTHONY E

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3764 Ex Parte Holness 11204754 - (D) GUIJT 102 102/103 Wilfred Holness JALALZADEH ABYAN, SHILA

Furthermore, the mere existence of an apparatus does not necessarily render unpatentable all the possible
methods to which it may be adapted. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co., 185 U.S. 403, 424-5 (1902).

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1732 Ex Parte Huang et al 12558752 - (D) OWENS 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C./FGTL FORREST, MICHAEL

1791 Ex Parte Moore et al 12329685 - (D) KIMLIN 103 Carstens & Cahoon, LLP LEBLANC, KATHERINE DEGUIRE

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2155 Ex Parte Faraboschi et al 11740254 - (D) BRANCH 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY HAVAN, HUNG T

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2452 Ex Parte McClain et al 12114295 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. /Oracle America/ SUN / STK GOLABBAKHSH, EBRAHIM

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2644 Ex Parte Diaz et al 11319761 - (D) WORMMEESTER 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C./Alcatel-Lucent EDOUARD, PATRICK NESTOR

giannelli

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1777 Ex Parte Srinivasan et al 12692954 - (D) GARRIS 103 ADVANCED LIQUID LOGIC, INC. C/O WARD AND SMITH, P.A. SODERQUIST, ARLEN

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Sukach et al 10988942 - (D) PAULRAJ 103 Baker Botts LLP FABER, DAVID

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2454 Ex Parte Jung et al 11041861 - (D) ASTORINO 103 IV - SUITER SWANTZ PC LLO DONAGHUE, LARRY D

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3624 Ex Parte FEBONIO et al 11566358 - (D) ASTORINO 103 IBM CORP (YA) C/O YEE & ASSOCIATES PC MARCUS, LELAND R

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Tjelmeland 11762862 - (D) GRIMES 103 DUBOIS, BRYANT, CAMPBELL & SCHWARTZ, LLP MILES, JONATHAN WADE

3738 Ex Parte Stevens 10047581 - (D) GRIMES 103 JOHNSON & JOHNSON PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D

AFFIRMED-IN-PART 
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Bangor 10267068 - (D) MacDONALD 103 103 AT&T Legal Department - JW TRAN, QUOC A

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3644 Ex Parte Cloft 12016234 - (D) HOELTER 103 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY c/o CPA Global SANDERSON, JOSEPH W

Marche is silent regarding any teaching of a pivotal support and we have recently been instructed that
indicating that a prior device could perform as claimed without also indicating “whether it was obvious to modify” the prior device to do so, is indicative that the Examiner has not “met his initial burden of establishing a case of prima facie obviousness.” In re Giannelli, 739 F.3d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Wu et al 11849815 - (D) BROWN 103 103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (PCPI) C/O FLETCHER YODER HEINRICH, SAMUEL M

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2644 Ex Parte Kueh 11730481 - (D) STEPHENS 102 SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL PATEL, AJIT

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3686 Ex Parte Jung et al 11728025 - (D) CHERRY 103 Constellation Law Group, PLLC PAULS, JOHN A

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3781 Ex Parte Murdock 12152790 - (D) ASTORINO 112(2)/102 Southeast IP Group, LLC VOLZ, ELIZABETH J

vaeck

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1787 Ex Parte Klett et al 12308330 - (D) GARRIS 103 KENYON & KENYON LLP SHOSHO, CALLIE E

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2862 Ex Parte Gysling et al 12197748 - (D) BEST 103 EXPRO METERS, INC. LEE, PAUL D

Appellants characterize their argument as being that Gysling and Small teach away from the proposed combination. (App. Br. 5.) The substance of Appellants’ argument, however, is directed to the question of whether a person of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation that the teachings of the two references could be combined successfully. Such an expectation is a necessary part of a prima facie case of obviousness. In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488, 493 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Vaeck, In re, 947 F.2d 448, 20 USPQ2d 1438 (Fed. Cir. 1991)  2107.01 ,   2144.08 ,    2164.01 ,   2164.01(c) ,   2164.03 ,   2164.06(b) ,   2164.08

2874 Ex Parte Hughes et al 11430352 - (D) FRANKLIN Dissenting TIMM 103 WALL & TONG, LLP/ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. HAHM, SARAH UH YOUNG

2886 Ex Parte Bills et al 12570527 - (D) BEST 103 Luedeka Neely Group, P.C. PHAM, HOA Q

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Atkins et al 11865112 - (D) FREDMAN 103 102 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY TAPP, AMELIA L

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2158 Ex Parte Garbow et al 12061107 - (D) BUI 102 IBM CORPORATION HASAN, SYED HAROON

winner int'l, medichem

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2878 Ex Parte Gelb et al 11455149 - (D) HASTINGS 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY LE, BAO-LUAN Q

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2688 Ex Parte Allen et al 11419279 - (D) SMITH 102/103 103 LSI Corporation HITT GAINES, PC MERCEDES, DISMERY E

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3714 Ex Parte SCHMIDT 11619966 - (D) ASTORINO 103 BEEM PATENT LAW FIRM MYHR, JUSTIN L

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1759 Ex Parte Kim et al 11460188 - (D) KAISER 103 Vista IP Law Group LLP KAUR, GURPREET

1793 Ex Parte Cristadoro et al 12481055 - (D) OWENS 103 AlbertDhand LLP TRAN, LIEN THUY

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2688 Ex Parte Smith et al 11317442 - (D) SHAW 103 GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC PENDLETON, DIONNE

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3633 Ex Parte Nichols et al 11950808 - (D) ASTORINO 103 Georgia-Pacific LLC STEPHAN,BETH A

Notably,

[A] given course of action often has simultaneous advantages and disadvantages, and this does not necessarily obviate motivation to combine. See [Winner Int'l Royalty Corp. v. Wang, 202 F.3d 1340, 1349 n. 8 (Fed. Cir. 2000)] (“The fact that the motivating benefit comes at the expense of another benefit, however, should not nullify its use as a basis to modify the disclosure of one reference with the teachings of another. Instead, the benefits, both lost and gained, should be weighed against one another.”).

Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L., 437 F.3d 1157, 1165 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2822 Ex parte CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 6,534,805 et al 09/829,510 90011833 - (D) FISHMAN 102/103 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Third Party Requester: DLA Piper LLP (US) ANDUJAR, LEONARDO original THOMAS, TONIAE M

2821 Ex parte ADFLASH LIMITED Patent Owner, Appellant Ex Parte 6169368 et al 09/101,612 90012089 - (D) HOMERE 103 CARMODY TORRANCE SANDAK & HENNESSEY LLP For Third Party Requester: ADE & COMPANY INC. original WAGNER, ANDERSON & BRIGHT, LLP YIGDALL, MICHAEL J original VU, DAVID HUNG

rambus, abbott diabetes

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1729 Ex Parte HOCHGRAF et al 12187069 - (D) NAGUMO 102 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION MILLER IP GROUP, PLC WANG, EUGENIA

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2158 Ex Parte Ramer et al 11553713 - (D) LORIN 102 Millennial Media, Inc. TRAN, BAO G

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3687 Ex Parte Canter et al 11772533 - (D) FETTING 102/103 DOCKET CLERK AN, IG TAI

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1789 Ex Parte Wright 11564786 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 Ballard Spahr LLP JUSKA, CHERYL ANN

1789 Ex Parte Wright 11564771 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 Ballard Spahr LLP JUSKA, CHERYL ANN

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2172 Ex Parte OSullivan et al 11948458 - (D) PAULRAJ 102/103 CRGO LAW STEVEN M. GREENBERG TAN, ALVIN H

In applying a broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Federal Circuit had recognized that a statement in a specification that a claim term "refers to" something can serve as a limitation.  See In re Rambus, 694 F.3d 42, 45-47 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (construing term "memory device" based on specification's disclosure that "[i]n general, each teaching of this invention which refers to a memory device can be practiced using a tranceiver device and one or more memory devices"); see also In re Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., 696 F.3d 1142, 1150 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (recognizing that "[e]ven when guidance is not provided in a explicit definitional format, the specification may define claim terms by implication such that the meaning may be found in or ascertained by a reading of the patent documents").

2172 Ex Parte OSullivan et al 11948438 - (D) PAULRAJ 102/103 CRGO LAW STEVEN M. GREENBERG TAN, ALVIN H

2174 Ex Parte Adachi et al 11970395 - (D) CHERRY 102 101/obviousness-type double patenting CRGO LAW STEVEN M. GREENBERG SHIAU, SHEN C

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2424 Ex Parte Cloonan 10423501 - (D) HUME 103 ARRIS ANDRAMUNO, FRANKLIN S

2443 Ex Parte Bailey et al 11459694 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 IBM CORPORATION BELANI, KISHIN G

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2800 Ex Parte Oowatari et al 12230742 - (D) DELMENDO 103 OLIFF PLC TAMAI, KARL I

2815 Ex Parte Tran 11211911 - (D) PRAISS 103 Wells St. John P.S. LIN, JOHN

2845 Ex Parte Harel et al 12266234 - (D) GARRIS Dissenting WARREN 103 FAY SHARPE/LUCENT LE, HOANGANH T

2898 Ex Parte Daubenspeck et al 12344711 - (D) HANLON 102/103 ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI SAFRAN & COLE, P.C. SHOOK, DANIEL P

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3663 Ex Parte Breed et al 12020684 - (D) CAPP 103 112(2) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 112(2) BRIAN ROFFE, ESQ TISSOT, ADAM D

3693 Ex Parte Mahaney et al 10774058 - (D) FETTING 103 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. NORMAN, SAMICA L

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3671 LAWN SOLUTIONS COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, INC. Requester, Cross-Appellant and Respondent v. TURFCO MANUFACTURING., INC. Patent Owner, Appellant and Respondent Ex Parte 6708773 et al 10/293,528 95001490 - (D) McCARTHY 102/103 102/103 KAMRATH IP Lawfirm, P.A. THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER: Middleton & Reutlinger GRAHAM, MATTHEW C original PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC

edge

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1631 Ex Parte Angelides 13485849 - (D) ADAMS 103 Eric P. Mirabel, JD, LLM RIGGS II, LARRY D

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2171 Ex Parte Baumgart 11610591 - (D) GRIMES 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION LEGGETT, ANDREA C.

2176 Ex Parte Rubanovich et al 11848850 - (D) FREDMAN 103 BLACKBERRY/FINNEGAN BURKE, TIONNA M

Therefore, the “reentry” step of Pathiyal is omitted in the claim 1 method, but the function of outputting a list is retained by claim 1. “While it may often be true that the mere omission of an element together with its function does not produce a patentable invention, it may also be unobvious to omit an element while retaining its function.” In re Edge, 359 F.2d 896, 899 (CCPA 1966). We are therefore, constrained to reverse this rejection.

Edge, In re, 359 F.2d 896, 149 USPQ 556 (CCPA 1966) 2144.04

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2435 Ex Parte Brickell 10999576 - (D) NAPPI 103 37 C.F.R. 41.50(b) 101 Mission/BSTZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN PALIWAL, YOGESH

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2848 Ex Parte Thorson 12497580 - (D) PAK 103 HAVERSTOCK & OWENS LLP WU, JERRY

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1754 Ex Parte Weber et al 11749808 - (D) KALAN 103 NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP SMITH, NICHOLAS A

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2686 Ex Parte Nishioka et al 11227947 - (D) SAADAT 102/103 EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP CAO, ALLEN T

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2811 Ex Parte Beeson et al 11388945 - (D) KATZ 102 Goldeneye, Inc. HSIEH, HSIN YI

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3774 Ex Parte Imhof 12296796 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. HOFFMAN, MARCIA

3778 Ex Parte Song 11741943 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 DORITY & MANNING, P.A. ANDERSON,CATHARINE L

INTER PARTES REVIEW

ALL CLAIMS INVALID
2767 APPLE INC. v ACHATES REFERENCE PUBLISHING, INC. 5,982,889 08/845,805 08845805 - (D) ARBES 102/103 PETITIONER: SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP PATENT OWNER: PATTERSON THUENTE PEDERSEN, P.A.; KAPLAN BREYER SCHWARTZ & OTTESEN; GIBBONS, P.C. original Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen, LL CALLAHAN, PAUL E

SOME CLAIMS INVALID
2767 APPLE INC. v ACHATES REFERENCE PUBLISHING, INC. 6,173,403 09/288,012 09288012 - (D) ARBES 102/103 102/103 PETITIONER: SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP PATENT OWNER: PATTERSON THUENTE PEDERSEN, P.A.; KAPLAN BREYER SCHWARTZ & OTTESEN; GIBBONS, P.C. original Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP CALLAHAN, PAUL E

clearvalue, sanofi

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1671 Ex Parte Sun et al 11880150 - (D) GRIMES 112(1) E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY PUTTLITZ, KARL J

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1791 Ex Parte Imison et al 11943758 - (D) PAK 112(2)/103 Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP ANDERSON, JERRY W

1792 Ex Parte Bertrand et al 10521579 - (D) KAISER 103 HOXIE & ASSOCIATES LLC CHAWLA, JYOTI

1792 Ex Parte Ambrogi et al 10598444 - (D) SMITH 103 K&L Gates LLP-Chicago CHAWLA, JYOTI

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2111 Ex Parte Zoch et al 11760223 - (D) KRIVAK 103 FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C. DALEY, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY

2176 Ex Parte Rubanovich et al 11848850 - (D) FREDMAN 103 BLACKBERRY/FINNEGAN BURKE, TIONNA M

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2448 Ex Parte Boutboul 12060299 - (D) GREENHUT 103 GIBB & RILEY, LLC SHINGLES, KRISTIE D

2474 Ex Parte Degenaro et al 12146758 - (D) WINSOR 103 SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER, P.C. HAILE, AWET A

2493 Ex Parte Jaquinta 11314555 - (D) GREENHUT 103 HOFFMAN WARNICK LLC SHAW, PETER C

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2818 Ex Parte Yun et al 11768790 - (D) PER CURIAM 102/103 ISHIMARU & ASSOCIATES LLP THOMAS, KIMBERLY M

2829 Ex Parte Kroneder 12220549 - (D) PAK 102 The Law Offices of Roger S. Thompson GUPTA, RAJ R

2837 Ex Parte Hoogzaad 12095555 - (D) BEST 102 NXP B.V. RO, BENTSU

The Examiner must establish a prima facie case of anticipation under § 102 by showing, as a matter of fact, that all elements arranged as specified in a claims are disclosed within the four corners of a reference, either expressly or inherently, in a manner enabling one skilled in the art to practice an embodiment of the claimed invention without undue experimentation. ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc., 668 F.3d 1340, 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex Inc., 550 F.3d 1075, 1083 (Fed, Cir. 2008).

Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex,Inc., 550 F.3d 1075, 1083 (Fed. Cir. 2008) 2131.02

2842 Ex Parte Na et al 12494681 - (D) KRATZ 103 IP & T GROUP LLP O NEILL, PATRICK

2894 Ex Parte Nandakumar et al 11771269 - (D) HANLON 103 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED LIGAI, MARIA

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3744 Ex Parte Braithwaite 11763005 - (D) REIMERS 103 American Air Liquide, Inc. SNOW, MAXWELL B

AFFIRMED-IN-PART 
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1734 Ex Parte Barberis et al 12312893 - (D) SMITH 103/obviousness-type double patenting 103/obviousness-type double patenting Davidson, Davidson & Kappel, LLC LEE, REBECCA Y

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2179 Ex Parte ARRASVUORI et al 11828820 - (D) GRIMES 102/103 101 Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C. TRAN, TUYETLIEN T

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2854 Ex Parte Flint et al 10986491 - (D) PAK 103 103 DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP MARINI, MATTHEW G

2892 Ex Parte Cheng 12048631 - (D) TIMM 103 103 McClure, Qualey & Rodack, LLP IDA, GEOFFREY H

2894 Ex Parte Sugiyama et al 11276349 - (D) TIMM 102/103 102/103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (DC) NGUYEN, DUY T V

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3689 Ex Parte Patenaude et al 11952271 - (D) LORIN 102 103 Dierker & Associates, P.C. ARAQUE JR, GERARDO

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Vanden Berghe 11326618 - (D) WARREN 103 EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP VU, JAKE MINH

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2123 Ex Parte Williams et al 10708032 - (D) BUI 103 SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION CRAIG, DWIN M

2167 Ex Parte Wu et al 11204698 - (D) CHEN 102 GARLICK & MARKISON (ALU) BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y

2184 Ex Parte McMillan et al 12147983 - (D) NEW 103 SHEEHAN PHINNEY BASS & GREEN, PA TSENG, CHENG YUAN

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2426 Ex Parte Fickle et al 10718376 - (D) COURTENAY 101/102/103 FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY, LLP HUYNH, AN SON PHI

2432 Ex Parte Mitchell et al 11283428 - (D) CURCURI 103 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (CH) LEMMA, SAMSON B

2488 Ex Parte Lu et al 11053214 - (D) MANTIS MERCADER 103 STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C. PE, GEEPY

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2616 Ex Parte Bae 11676628 - (D) DANG 103/obviousness-type double patenting Chrysler Group LLC CHU, DAVID H

2632 Ex Parte Lobo 11839771 - (D) MANTIS MERCADER 103 ALSTON & BIRD LLP BURD, KEVIN MICHAEL

2683 Ex Parte Dammertz 11787297 - (D) WEINSCHENK 103 MAGINOT, MOORE & BECK, LLP YANG, JAMES J

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2834 Ex Parte Takahashi et al 12093568 - (D) SMITH 103 SUGHRUE MION, PLLC MULLINS, BURTON S

2847 Ex Parte Victor 11933982 - (D) GARRIS obviousness-type double patenting TROJAN LAW OFFICES MAYO III, WILLIAM H

2859 Ex Parte Rosenbaum 12190823 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.C OMAR, AHMED H

2865 Ex Parte Yu et al 12101447 - (D) GARRIS 103 DORITY & MANNING, P.A. PARK, HYUN D

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3685 Ex Parte Lao 11826436 - (D) LORIN 112(1)/112(2) 112(2)/103 Reed Smith LLP KIM, STEVEN S

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Poynor 11822136 - (D) HILL 103 SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL BLAU, STEPHEN LUTHER

3718 Ex Parte Yankton et al 11208100 - (D) REIMERS 103 Dicke, Billig & Czaja, PLLC WONG, JEFFREY KEITH

3742 Ex Parte Feldhausen et al 12035895 - (D) ASTORINO 112(2)/103 obviousness-type double patenting Quaries & Brady, LLP. MAYE, AYUB A

3771 Ex Parte Besendorfer 11713331 - (D) HOUSEL 102/103 Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy THANH, QUANG D

3782 Ex Parte Daniels 11243115 - (D) REIMERS 112(2)/103 ROZSA LAW GROUP LC NEWHOUSE, NATHAN JEFFREY

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1755 Ex Parte Natural Alternatives, LLC. Ex Parte 6,080,330 et al 90/011,454 90/011,713 09/333,180 90010381 - (D) ROBERTSON 305/112(2)/102 103 KING & SCHICKLI, PLLC THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, KINDNESS, PLLC XU, LING X original GREEN, ANTHONY J

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2155 PERSONALIZED USER MODEL LLP Patent Owner and Appellant v. GOOGLE INC. Requester and Respondent Ex Parte 6981040 et al 09/597,975 95001569 - (D) BRANCH 102/103 DENTONS US LLP Third-Party Requester: Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP BANANKHAH, MAJID A original BAROT, BHARAT

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2618 SAUCON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Requester and Respondent v. SAIED TADAYON and BIJAN TADAYON Patent Owners and Appellants Ex Parte 7,031,657 B2 et al 10/235,567 95001644 - (D) BAUMEISTER 103 MAXVALUEIP CONSULTING THIRD PARTY REQUESTOR: SANFORD J. PILTCH, ESQ. AHMED, SALMAN original CHU, MICHAEL

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2835 INCASE DESIGNS CORP. Requester v. TECH SHELL, INC. Patent Owner, Appellant Ex Parte 7643274 et al 11/788,329 95001766 - (D) SONG 103 THOMAS | HORSTEMEYER, LLP Third Party Requester: AKA CHAN LLP MELVIN CHAN REIP, DAVID OWEN original LEA EDMONDS, LISA S

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 TAYLOR MADE GOLF COMPANY, INC. Third Party Requester v. TRIPLE TEE GOLF, INC. Patent Owner/Appellant Ex Parte 7854667 et al 11/588,992 95002052 - (D) MARTIN 102/103 MELVIN K. SILVERMAN & ASSOCS. Third Party Requester: Sheppard Mullen Richter & Hampton, LLP GRAHAM, MATTHEW C original PASSANITI, SEBASTIANO

american calcar, ashland oil

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2644 Ex Parte Charriere et al 10987944 - (D) DIXON 103 WILLIAMS MORGAN, P.C. LEE, JUSTIN YE

2687 Ex Parte Marks et al 11548462 - (D) DILLON 103 MITCHELL J. MARKS WILSON, BRIAN P

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2856 Ex Parte Veenstra 12187751 - (D) WILSON 102/103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C./FGTL JAGAN, MIRELLYS

2857 Ex Parte Filipovic 11965852 - (D) HASTINGS 103 Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP SCHECHTER, ANDREW M

AFFIRMED-IN-PART 
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2183 Ex Parte Wang et al 11321779 - (D) SAADAT 103 103 TROP, PRUNER & HU, P.C. PETRANEK, JACOB ANDREW

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2454 Ex Parte Blocksome 11829339 - (D) WEINSCHENK 103 101 IBM (ROC-BKLS) c/o Biggers Kennedy Lenart Spraggins LLP PARK, JEONG S

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2883 Ex Parte Anderson et al 12818586 - (D) KAISER 103 103 MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVEC LEPISTO, RYAN A

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1716 Ex Parte Price et al 12776235 - (D) SMITH 103 MPG LLP / Brooks MOORE, KARLA A

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2168 Ex Parte Hoskinson 11540628 - (D) DIXON 103 ARENT FOX LLP KOO, GARY J

2169 Ex Parte Enns 11581305 - (D) LORIN 103 Straub & Pokotylo HU, JENSEN

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2625 Ex Parte KRISHNAMURTHY 11612175 - (D) DIXON 103 KYOCERA INTERNATIONAL INC. HARRIS, DOROTHY H

2648 Ex Parte van Rooyen 12268917 - (D) FRAHM 103 STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C. SHARMA, SUJATHA R

2691 Ex Parte Skaug 10501676 - (D) DIXON 103 NOKIA CORPORATION c/o Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP KARIMI, PEGEMAN

2697 Ex Parte Grothe 11760915 - (D) DANG 103 HONEYWELL/IFL MARINELLI, PATRICK

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3629 Ex Parte Adam et al 11923003 - (D) PETRAVICK 112(2)/101/102 CRGO LAW THOMPSON, MICHAEL M

3657 Ex Parte Junig et al 11645151 - (D) GERSTENBLITH 102 ALFRED J MANGELS BOWES, STEPHEN M

REEXAMINATION

REVERSED 
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2825 Ex parte AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION Patent Owner, Appellant Ex Parte 6689629 et al 10/068,500 90009697 - (D) DIXON 102/103 WPAT, PC For Third Party Requester: MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE, LLP NGUYEN, TUAN H original EVERHART, CARIDAD

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2455 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., Patent Owner and Appellant v. A10 NETWORKS, INC., Requester Ex Parte JOSHI et al 7,584,301 10/839,919 95001812 - (D) MARTIN 102/103 2nd Reexam Group - Novak Druce + Quigg LLP For Third Party Requester: FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT AND DUNNER, LLP DESAI,RACHNA SINGH original WON, MICHAEL YOUNG

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2611 Ex parte INTERVAL LICENSING Ex Parte 6,263,507 et al 08/761,030 90012074 - (D) NAPPI 102/103 EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC BANANKHAH, MAJID A original MILLER, JOHN W

Finally, we are not persuaded of error by Owner’s argument based upon American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 651 F.3d 1318, 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2011), to show that “in response to” requires an automatic action without user interaction. Appeal Brief 25. The Federal Circuit’s decision in American
Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. involves a district court’s claim construction which is not based upon the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, and is based upon the disclosure in particular to that case. As such, the holding does not have direct bearing on the case currently before us. Thus, we concur with the Examiner’s interpretation of the limitation “generating . . . in response to the display of [the] first segment” to be such that there is a causal relationship between the first and second segments, but not limited to the generation being automatic and without user interaction.

2736 Ex parte MAGNA ELECTRONICS, INC. Ex Parte Schofield et al 6,222,447 09/313,139 90011478 - (D) KOHUT 103 VAN DYKE GARDNER LINN & BURKHART LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: SUGHRUE MION, PLLC BANANKHAH, MAJID A original LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC

In assessing the probative value of an expert opinion, we must consider three factors: 1) the interest of
the expert in the outcome of the case, 2) the presence or absence of factual support for the expert’s opinion, and 3) the strength of any opposing evidence. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc., 776 F.2d 281 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc., 776 F.2d 281, 227 USPQ 657 (Fed. Cir. 1985) 716.01(b) , 716.01(c) , 2145

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2838 SILERGY TECHNOLOGY, INC., Third Party Requester and Appellant v. MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., Patent Owner and Respondent Ex Parte 7714558 et al 11/216,276 95001625 - (D) MARTIN 112(1) Perkins Coie LLP - Monolithic Power Systems TIBBITS, PIA FLORENCE original ZHANG, JUE