PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

tokai

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2126 Ex Parte Rao et al 11332558 - (D) DIXON 103 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. NORTON, JENNIFER L

2141 Ex Parte Singh 11476435 - (D) FREDMAN 102/103 JENKINS, WILSON, TAYLOR & HUNT, P.A. SCENERA RESEARCH, LLC GUTIERREZ, ANDRES E

2175 Ex Parte Chakra et al 11846617 - (D) ADAMS 102/103 CRGO LAW STEVEN M. GREENBERG HO, RUAY L

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2875 Ex Parte IJZERMAN et al 13312101 - (D) ANKENBRAND 103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS TUMEBO, TSION M

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3617 Ex Parte Palinkas et al 12266181 - (D) WOODS 103 CHEMTURA CORPORATION BELLINGER, JASON R

3618 Ex Parte Kessler 12086277 - (D) HORNER 102/103 41.50 112(2) PAULEY PETERSEN & ERICKSON GURARI, EREZ

3675 Ex Parte Michael et al 12313933 - (D) WOODS 103 LATHROP & GAGE LLP LUGO, CARLOS

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2457 Ex Parte Breed 11968844 - (D) MORGAN 103 103 BRIAN ROFFE, ESQ TAYLOR, NICHOLAS R

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1627 Ex Parte Baur et al 12519410 - (D) McCOLLUM 103 MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, PC IVANOVA, SVETLANA M

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2123 Ex Parte Georgis et al 11974715 - (D) MANTIS MERCADER 103 Redwood Patent Law CHAD, ANISS

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2451 Ex Parte Bowman et al 10395081 - (D) FISHMAN 103 GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP PATEL, DHAIRYA A

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2631 Ex Parte Oksman 11599210 - (D) ZADO 103 Eschweiler & Associates (Lantiq) HUANG, DAVID S

2691 Ex Parte Amagami et al 12604001 - (D) JIVANI 103 Russell Ng PLLC (LENOVO) MISTRY, RAM A

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3643 Ex Parte Noblitt 11738257 - (D) FREDMAN 103 THE NOBLITT GROUP, PLLC VALENTI, ANDREA M

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2682 APPLE, INC., Requester, v. CLASSCO INC., Patent Owner. Ex Parte 6970695 et al 10/042,686 95002109 - (D) SIU 103 DAVID M QUINLAN, PC THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LEUNG, CHRISTINA Y original NGUYEN, LEE

In other words, Patent Owner does not demonstrate a sufficient nexus between the alleged “praise” and the claimed invention. In addition, as previously discussed, storing identification data and producing a voice announcement (i.e., audio corresponding to identification data of a caller) is disclosed by Fujioka. Under these circumstances, the alleged “praise” stems from what was known in the prior art so that there can be no nexus. Tokai Corp. v. Easton Enters., Inc., 632 F.3d 1358, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2011). ...

Hence, at best, the alleged commercial success would stem from a feature disclosed in the prior art so that there can be no nexus. Tokai Corp. v. Easton Enters., Inc., 632 F.3d 1358, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

No comments :