PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board Updated Daily.

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

constant, enhanced security

custom search

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2881 Ex Parte Doring et al 12252050 - (D) WILSON 103 O'Shea Getz P.C. IPPOLITO, NICOLE MARIE

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1783 Ex Parte COOPER 12458111 - (D) McSHANE 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC AUER, LAURA A

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2654 Ex Parte Blatchley et al 12208326 - (D) BEAMER 103 IBM CORPORATION GRAHAM, ANDREW R


Tech Center 2600 Communications
2614 K/S HIMPP, Requester and Cross Appellant, v. AUDITORY LICENSING COMPANY, LLC, Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 7,751,580 et al 10/325,529 95000612 - (D) POTHIER 103 CANTOR COLBURN LLP FOR THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER: STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C. WEAVER, SCOTT LOUIS original ENSEY, BRIAN

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3636 DIS-TRAN WOOD PRODUCTS LLC Third Party Requester/Respondent v. BROOKS MANUFACTURING CO. Patent Owner/Appellant Ex Parte 7007438 et al 10/254,412 95002191 - (D) MARTIN 103 K&L GATES LLP-Pittsburgh THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP GRAHAM, MATTHEW C original BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL

Contrary to the Patent Owner's argument, the Federal Circuit has held that "[i]f accessibility is proved, there is no requirement to show that particular members of the public actually received the information." Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1988). In applying this rule, the Federal Circuit held that, in a similar situation, a product manual bearing an inscription dating the manual to May 1996, where a declarant stated that it was publicly available to customers, was prior art "[i]n view of the Manual's inscription date, the Smaha Declaration, and evidence of NetStalker advertisements published in 1995." In re Enhanced Sec. Research, LLC 739 F.3d 1347, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 7 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1988) 706.02 ,   2128.02 ,   2129 ,   2145 ,   2152.03

No comments :